Preview

Why Is The Federalist Still Relevant

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Federalist Still Relevant
Are the Federalist papers still Relevant? Keith Morphis
The question of “Are the federalist papers still relevant?” is a very important question.
It is especially important the current state of affairs in this country over the last 20 plus years.
Throughout history also in other nations the arguments of the Federalist Papers ring true and human nature seems to reinforce them.
One quote from the Federalist No.10 paper that I feel is more relevant now than ever especially for someone on the left is “It is in vain to say that enlightened statesmen will be able to adjust these clashing interests and render them all subservient to the public good.
Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.”(Hamilton, 1787, p.2) This line is speaking
to
…show more content…
The Job of the Judicial branch is generally to be a referee between the
Executive and legislative branches. The Executive recommends people for positons as judges but the congress votes them in, and this is how there is a relative protection from favoritism in that only impartial judges will be nominated and voted into power. This is because both parties know that if they abuse the system while in the majority that the favor will be returned down the line.
Madison goes on to speak of the flaws of man and the necessary needs of any government to keep from becoming abusive. He writes “The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government.”(Madison, 1788,
p.2). His point is that in order to prevent any one part of government from becoming too powerful and tyrannical, the others must have similar ambitions to keep the powers they have and to prevent the other branches from growing power. This has been an ongoing problem from the beginning of the country, from Roosevelts Court packing move in the 30’s, on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist #51 Analysis

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Madison states, “each department should have a will of its own” he is referring to the idea that each branch of government must have its own set responsibilities within the government. Therefore the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government must maintain separation from each other and must not refer to one another when carrying out responsibilities. They each must maintain loyalty to their separate ideas, not letting either of the other too branches influence their decision-making.…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this document, Madison argues that judges should be free of political pressures from the other branches of government. Several arrangements within the Constitution were included under the provision of an Independent Judiciary. These include the appointment of federal…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “..the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…(The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other,”(James Madison, Federalist Papers #51). This basically tells us that they use a system of checks and balances to divide the power to make it all equal. James Madison does believe that there can by tyranny in democracy if someone has more than one set of powers like if someone was in the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court. That one person would have too much power and could mess up the whole government system to get what he/she wants. The system of checks and balances keep each branch in order, so everybody has a say in what’s going on. One way the Legislative Branch checks the Executive Branch is by approving Presidential nominations and one way Legislative checks the Judicial is by impeaching and removing judges from office. One way Executive Branch checks Legislative Branch is the president vetoing Congressional legislation and one way they check Judicial Branch is by nominating the judges when there’s a spot open. Lastly, one way Judicial Branch checks Legislative Branch is by declaring laws unconstitutional and they check Executive Branch by declaring presidential acts unconstitutional. Using Checks and Balances, all three branches share equal…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison continues to sway the mind of the critics who oppose the U.S. Constitution. Again, the opposition was worried that too much power has been placed in the hands of central government. He goes on to express the necessity of the Union and what the Union stands for. He challenges the naysayers to be realistic how much strength is required in a government to sustain the Union. The way I think of it is if everyone was on a different page and didn’t centralize things how would we get things establish as a…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s The Federalist 10 and 51, he argues for more government power over the people. He explains that factions might come up and infringe on the rights of other citizens and giving the government more power will help these factions stay under control. He argues that factions or “men of factitious tempers…may by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people…” Madison believed greatly in the powers for the government and we see this where he says “But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” He doesn’t just say to give the government unlimited power but also says that “the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” He argued for more power to the government but also wanted the government to not be corrupt.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Madison also stated that if an individual group of people had power in more than one branch, then that was tyranny. They would be able to manipulate and unbalance the branches. Others agreed with him because no one wanted to end up like the country they left. They wanted everything to be equal, and they didn’t want any supreme power. Furthermore, the Constitution and it’s creators state that the three branches of the government have power over each other in different ways to keep each other balanced. For example, the legislative branch, or Congress, can impeach the president if they are not doing their job well. The president can veto laws that Congress vote on if he or she thinks the law should not pass for whatever reason they have. But, if Congress still believes the law should pass, they can vote again and the law will pass automatically if more than two thirds of congress is for the law. In this way the Legislative and Executive branches are balancing each other by keeping laws and the president in check. The Judicial branch also helps balance the other branches. The Judicial branch can declare laws and acts of the executive branch unconstitutional. Congress can impeach judges and agree/disagree on the president’s choices of the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So, we decided to oppose the federalists with our own party and kind of government. Interview with Thomas Jefferson Interviewer: Why did you form the democratic republican party? Jefferson: We were just starting out as an independent country, and we were struggling to figure out what we wanted it to be.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To save the minority from the power of the majority by having a robust republic. James Madison is arguing for a dexterous federal government to be protect the people. Madison support this point in of protecting individual right by evidence found in the Federalist 10. James Madison is trying to persuade the people of America that his view for the government is the right one. Madison see what happen when a weak federal government is in control it lead to government who is ineffective at providing the state the assistance that it need then the states fall into disorder.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The problem that has prevented us from solving tyranny in government is the lingering ignorance combined with the open interpretation of each person’s and each branch of government’s role. Madison was more partial to the belief that the size of the growing nation would also allow for growth of more separate interests to prevent one majority. The encompassing social pressure, however, is something that Madison didn’t account for. What Madison hoped was, “…that no common interest or passion will be likely to unite a majority of the whole number in an unjust pursuit.” (Kernell, pg.349)…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judiciary branch has the job to interpret the constitution, and often these interpretations change over time. Chief Justice John Marshall’s rulings established precedents for national supremacy over states’ rights, defined the roles of the Supreme Court and Congress, and provides the constitutional foundation for the economic growth of the United States; Furthermore, the court cases and Chief Justice John Marshall’s decisions have helped shape the world as…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Madison notes that factions are a serious problem in a republican form of government because a democracy is similar to a court. What is the problem with this court?…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inadequacy Of Congress

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The constitution of the United States distinctly trichotomizes judicial, legislative, and executive power between the Supreme Court, Congress, and the President, allowing a system that functions through checks and balances. Since congress is a political organ whose members have different interests, this separation of power has not been conducive to drafting policies that effectively address pressing public issues. Madison expands on this lack of efficacy when he notes that “the powers of the legislative organs of government are derived from the electorates”. This shows that members of Congress represent a particular legislative unit and as a result they will always tend to act in the interests of those they represent. In this scenario, coming…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is the power of the judicial branch to decide that acts of the legislative and executive branches of government are unconstitutional. These acts will be declared impossible to enforce. With this concept, the Supreme Court is allowed to ensure the other branches of government follow the Constitution. Thus, checks and balances, which is a system used to prevent one branch of government from becoming too powerful, is maintained. Marbury v. Madison was the first case the Supreme Court applied judicial review to. In the last days of the John Adams’ presidency, Adams approved of several Supreme Court justices. The commissions of these justices were not delivered when President Thomas Jefferson took office. Jefferson sent James Madison, who was the Secretary of State at the time, not to…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays