Preview

Why Murder Is Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Murder Is Wrong
Murder is wrong. Since we were kids we have been told this. So what exactly is capital punishment? It is described as one person taking the life another. It is undeniably paradoxical that the state will allow the execution of a person as a quick fix to crime and violence. Capital punishment is not a necessity. However, in many instances it seems that doing the wrong thing is the correct thing to do.
Since the beginning of 1976-2014, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, there has been a total of 1,390 executions within the United States. Capital punishment is nothing but an act of violence. The violence used in these cases will never be a solution to the crimes committed. We as individuals are allegedly entitled to believe that our government is unprejudiced and just. However, death penalty is the most neglected arrangement of government hypocrisy. We kill people who kill others to show that killing is wrong. The government contradicts itself. When the government tolerates execution we are leaving an impression on
…show more content…
Yet, in most cases, the victim’s families can not get closure by simply killing another person. That leads to the same exact problem. Losing someone no matter the way it happens is heartbreaking, wrecking, and unbearable. Some families believe the pain will go away if they kill the person who brought this pain upon them. They want to feel relief and find closure. The pain that they feel is inescapable and is the natural way of life. A group organized by victim’s family such as, Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation, oppose the death penalty. They think it’s morally wrong to kill so they distinguish themselves differently. They don’t ever want to downgrade to the level of the murderer. MVFR oppose to endless trials that re-open emotional wounds and put off the time when real healing can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murder is one of the crimes that can be applied for the death penalty.A Lot of people probably think that if someone were to murder someone they deserve the death penalty.However I believe they deserve to suffer in prison and live in a cell and think for every hour of the day about what they did.In my opinion if they get the death penalty that is the easy way out.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>In The Bible, there is a statement that says "Thou shalt not kill," and yet the government believes it can punish for what it already does. It is a crime within a crime and the government should "Practice what they preach." This has been going on for so long that most nations have created a numbness to death.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment (death penalty) violates the United States Constitution. According to the 8th Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual" punishments are inflicted. The death penalty is retribution, involves inhumane procedures, and it is an unfair way to solve problems. the death penslty is not a good way to serve justice.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unjust execution of an innocent person can never be corrected, leaving a horrendous wound. From the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (ncadp.org), Freddie Lee Pitts, a man who was exonerated from Florida’s death row (found innocent) was quoted saying: “You can release an innocent man from prison, but you can’t release him from the grave.” This confirms how killing an innocent person is not only destroying his life, yet the lives of friends and family because once a person has died, there’s isn’t a way to bring them back. Also from ncadp.org, Jerry Givens, a retired executioner said, “You sentenced a guy to be executed... then you send him to me to be put to death. Then later on... this guy was innocent... I’m going to suffer a lot because I performed the job.” This demonstrates that killing an innocent person cannot be undone. Wardens, executioners, and journalists experience forms of distress or turn to drugs, alcohol, or both. Without the death penalty, no one would need to go through pain comparable to that. Those last few minutes of life of innocent prisoners were horrid, knowing their innocence had shattered and there wasn’t anything to justify that they weren’t…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty in Peru

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, death penalty has pros and some are these. It is allowable because the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed. As consequence, death penalty is going to stop criminals from murdering. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his/her life. Many people will agree that death penalty is just and fair. Additionally, the death penalty can lower crime, and is not an evil punishment, it’s the person who committed such a crime who deserves the death penalty.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Murder Justifiable

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is no logical reason for taking the life of another in no way is it justifiable, with the added bonus of justice there is also the internal feeling of knowing you have committed an unanswerable crime of violence and you walk freely. Have you ever done something you know are not right and have the guilt eat away at you until you have to come clean (shorten this question)? Imagine that same feeling ten times worst because you took the life of another one who might not have believed in heaven or hell and this was their only chance to live for anything .This all because you have a believe that they had wronged you( not needed). The guilt alone is as painful as justice because it can send people mad with this feeling and some even go as extreme as suicide (redundant). Guilt can also send you in the direction of hurting or even killing your loved ones the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One reason they would possibly give is that it is unjust because it could be an innocent person that was killed but you can not bring that person back to life after you figure out that they are innocent. There are no second chances when you take the person's life so you would have to be completely sure that this person is guilty. In our current time it will be easier to tell that the person is innocent or not by using their dna to compare the dna found on the victim's’ body. The family of the victim will think that the only way that they will be satisfied is if the other person was to be killed but then they will feel even worse because they wanted that person to be killed. The people will only be satisfied when they commemorate his/her life and realize that everything that happens is for a…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    grade 11 essay

    • 791 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For hundreds of years capital punishment has been widely regarded as the best way to punish a criminal who has committed a serious crime against humanity. Although there can be benefits to ending a violent criminals life, there are obviously questionable aspects to punishing murder with more murder. However you may look at it, capital punishment still is and always will be a form of murder. I believe that that capital punishment is an ineffective deterrent especially in today’s world were legal consequences are designed to effectively teach the convict and general public from right and wrong, as well as make sure that crime does not reoccur.…

    • 791 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally, once a crime has been committed, further death should not have to take place in our society anymore. It is understandable that a grieving family member needs closure, but isn 't life in prison enough? Murdering a murderer does not justify the fact that the crime has been committed. You cannot just recognize that he/she has committed a crime, and then put them to death. This shows that you have no affection for human life itself and this is what we can call revenge.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First and foremost the issue of the death penalty is a very immoral practise. It is a system which clearly believes two wrongs can make a right. In principle it is immoral, and it is unfair and discriminatory in practice. No one deserves to die and no one should give themselves or be given the power to choose whether another human being gets to live or die. When governments’ pass out vengeance disguised as justice, they stoop down to the killer’s level and devalue human life and human dignity just as the killers and other criminals do. Our society is civilized such that we reject the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays