Preview

Why Should Animal Testing Be Necessary?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
875 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should Animal Testing Be Necessary?
Animal experiments are always a controversial topic because of the moral issue. Most of the people who are disagreeing animal testing is because they believed that animal can feel pain like humans do. Animal testing in the United States is accessory to the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) [1], passed in 1966 and amended in 1970 and 1976. In a recent article, Parliament [2] said that animal research is the use of non-anthropoid animals in experiment that’s explore to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. This essay will examine the arguments for and against whether animal testing is necessary.

Animal testing may help human science make greater progress, so that human beings have the ability to save move people lives in the future. Modern science uses animal experiments to invent new medicines to treat various previously untreatable diseases to ensure that millions of patients and future people will survive long-term, healthy lives. Scientists use animal to do experiments instead of using human beings is to decrease the danger of fatal harm. Meanwhile, they can
…show more content…
Some animal experiments are aimed to save animals' lives. Animals would get sick as humans do, and human would like to save animals' lives as well, so we invented vaccines to save their lives. In that case, scientists have to do the animal testing to ensure that the vaccines can cure millions of sick animals but not killing them. If scientists did not test on animals, countless animals' lives would have taken by distemper, tetanus and parvovirus [6]. Some animal species avoid the extinction by the testing on animals. For example, the black-footed ferret, the tamarins of Brazil and the California condor [7]. Because of the animal testing, humans have now been able to see those animals on earth and those animals which are have the opportunity to multiply the offspring

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Animal Testing Is Cruel and Immoral Regardless of the Benefits Associated With It,” by George Wright and Steve Hoagland, the authors, argue that the use of animals for medical experiments is an immoral practice. The authors describe why people do not ask if the human species is more deserving of under going medical experiments than the animals. Also, in the article by Peter Singer, he said that if we share with them a capacity to suffer, this means that animals like people have interests. Like racism or sexists who believe that those who belong to their race or sex are superior, we are doing the same to the animals. But, there is no difference because animals also can feel. Why can only animals suffer? Wright and Hoagland demonstrate, that the human take advantage to govern the animals like capturing them and holding them in tiny cages. The authors give examples, about the last incident in 1983 at the University of Pennsylvania in which 150 baboons suffered brain damage. No doubt, there are a lot of cruelty of animals, but not just for the the…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments, others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and, therefore, make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments, but not outcomes that are effective enough in the human body, therefore should not be using animals.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand it can quite helpful in finding new cures without human trials. This possibly saving human lives is why I think that they do the animal testing first. I know it may sound a little harsh but would you rather risk a special bred mouse for the experiment, or yourself? That is the main focus of my paper today is to bring to your attention the pros and cons of the animal testing going on today. That is the whole principle of animal testing is to reduce human suffering, so we can live today to get to tomorrow. So maybe we can find the cure for cancer or aids with animal testing doing no harm to the human race. So therefore both sides of the argument have very good statements, so we will have to differ between them to see which one is…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should scientists examine their harmful substances on animals? Approximately two to five million animals have been used under testing (''Animal Aid,'' n.d). Animal testing has increased worldwide, scientists believe that animals are the best sacrifice for these specific type of tests which include a wide range of chemicals, which include vaccines and drugs because they believe that animals are the only species that proper things to be examined on and usually will not feel anything even if they got sick after being testing on, and which will lead to poisoning animals and eventually harming them. Excess killing of animals can cause extinction of its own kind. People around the world find that animal testing is much better and safer, in contrast a major amount of people are not happy with what is happening to the pets if the experiments are not safe and the creatures are getting hurt.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common knowledge that many animals are used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo countless of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very beneficial to use animal for many reasons. One reason is because it lowers how many humans we have to test on, which it is way better then testing on humans. It also gets quicker approval. In cases where it is unethical to test on humans, animals are available to be used. Even though it is testing on a different species it is very reliable, because they are similar enough to humans. Animals themselves benefit from the testing on animals. This does not make sense at first, but when you think about it a little more it makes sense because discoveries are also made that help the animals along the way.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the dawn (used a more powerful word for emphasis) of time, humans have used animals for food, clothing, and other necessary purposes. As time moves on, and technology advances, humans begin to rely on medicine for their health. And still to today, we use animals for our needs. Animals have supplied us with the technology and advances in the medical field. Without them, we would have never been able to perfect the polio vaccine. They are a vital part of our survival. Animal testing strengthens our community and saves us from possible casualties. There are many reasons to keep up this practice of animal testing. It has been happening for years, so why stop now?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, and check the safety of products destined for human use. Animals that are used to test medical treatments or other scientific tests most of the time don’t survive, for every hundred medications tested, 92% of them fail, and 50% of the animals that got tested die, those that don't die are later killed(92/100 animals ...."Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing). The animals that are being tested on do not live good lives either, as they can’t choose when and what to eat, or how they will spend their…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has become a barbaric form of testing in today’s world. It has been a debated topic for decades. Both sides have presented both strong and weak arguments alike. Those who would argue against animal testing have taken a stand due to the way it affects animals. Even in the best circumstances, the animals could easily be considered abused. Those in favor of animal testing, a quickly waning population, don’t seem to deny the abuse that exists. Rather, they argue that the pain is justified. To be clear, this article isn’t an argument of whether or not they are abused but if it is still justified.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing Over 100 million animals die each year from unnecessary animal testing. Animal testing is very bad, there is no need for animal testing today because of new and better technologies. New technologies can take the place of animal testing. These technologies are better and more efficient to research. Animal testing is controversial because of medical research.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year more than 100 millions animals die due to animal testing, but many medical breakthroughs that have been discovered through animal experimentation include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin, and many others. Which should we value above the other? Some simply see black and white to this problem, which one is right and which one is wrong. But others see shades of gray, as to some attributes of one side are okay, while the other one is not. Animal testing should be allowed if experimentation is for something that benefits society, but should not be used for pure selfish curiosity, or for reasons that count to others as needed experiments when they could have just simplify used other methods.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays