Preview

Work in Progress: Sucess/Failures of Bismark 1871-1889

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Work in Progress: Sucess/Failures of Bismark 1871-1889
Success and failures of Bismarck’s foreign policies
Bismarck, nicknamed the ‘iron chancellor’ can be considered as the father of Germany, uniting Prussia and other states. During his years as chancellor from 1871-1890, he successfully secured the new German boarders by keeping peace within Europe.
Through rallying the southern states of Germany by engaging the Franco-Prussian war of 1871, with the German ‘traditional enemy, Bismarck successfully achieved his aim of uniting the scattered states of Germany and in addition gained control over the fertile lands: Alsace and Lorraine through the treaty of Frankfurt in 1871. This sparked a new era for international relationships between the great European powers as Bismarck efficiently modernized Germany in both industrialization and enhancing the German military.
During his time as chancellor, Bismarck’s priority was to keep Germany a ‘satisfied state’ through keeping peace in Europe, he stated ‘…here is Russia and here is France, and we are in the middle’. As problems started to appear such as the demise of the ‘sick man of Europe’ and increased tension of the Balkan states that might jeopardize peace in Europe, Bismarck cleverly making alliances with Russia and Austria-Hungary, both geographically and politically with the signing of the first Dreikaiserbund of 1873. The signing of the DKB strongly deterred any alliance between Russia and France; in addition, the DKB eased the tension between Russia and Austria-Hungary over the Balkan issues, which could have easily ignite a war in Europe, thus the forming of the DKB can be arguably one of the greatest success in foreign policy from Bismarck.
In 1875, Bismarck foolishly provoked war against France with no clear purpose but also contradicted his policy to keep the boarders of Germany safe with the arising of the ‘War in sight’ crisis. Although the crisis may have been caused by Bismarck’s restlessness of France rapidly recovering her loses from the treaty of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prime Minister then decided to provoke France into a war. He wanted to make sure no one would try and intervene in German affairs and bring some of the smaller German states out of the nation as a whole. He then adds insult to injury by suggesting a…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With chancellor Otto Bismark, Germany went through a wars that would help bring the people together and make them have pride in their nation. The Austria-Prussian war was between Prussia and Austria over the lands of Holstein, Prussia was able to defeat Austria which meant they had a better military as well as more land. Bismark knew that threw wars, Germany would come together as a nation. The other war that helped unify Prussia was the Franco-Prussian war where Prussia defeated France and took their lands of ALcraine and lorraine. By having wars, Germany was able to come together and have a sense of nationalism for being superior in continental…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although Germany ultimately became a powerful nation and yearned for European peace, Otto von Bismarck developed alliance mechanisms and he maintained Germany’s leadership in national affairs, previously Bismarck was fired by William II Germany began a pursuit to expand which angered other European countries, once shot was fired, alliances tightened and the First World War began. Otto von Bismarck’s methods to keep peace in Europe, impacted the power of Germany as a nation. Young Emperor William II dismissed Bismarck which generated the Rival Blocs, separating Europe. Subsequently Serbian revolutionaries assassinated Austria’s heir to the throne, and a war which was suppose to “clear the air” lasts for four years. The many alliances and enemies triggered World War One.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He quickly learned how to play the uber Catholic, conservative, and liberal sides when needed, and he eventually learned how to balance his policies so that each side remained fairly contained (Doc 4). During the 1800s, talk of liberal reforms, socialism, and communism was rising. Many people in the German government realized this insurgent of new thoughts and encouraged Bismarck to modify his policies. Politicians such as Wagener in document three wrote to audiences in the Reichstag and even Bismarck himself because the politicians knew that they could not risk losing the worker’s votes to the Socialist Party who promised laborers their own rights and insurance (Doc 3). Bismarck realized his politicians spoke the truth. From Bismarck’s point of view, he knew that if he didn’t adapt at least some version of these rising demands, he would remain Chancellor for a very short time. Thus, when it came to social reforms, Bismarck adopted his own version of the socialist party’s platform. He stated he would compromise by taking on some socialistic reforms because those reforms were a way to help those who cannot help themselves (Doc 6). Even the Kaiser himself realized his government must make their own approach to social reform. Bismarck promoted accident coverage for laborers and welfare for people who do not have the ability to work-- all ideas sprung from moderate…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the leadership of Bismarck, Germany experienced a time of great division between classes and some financial crashes, such as “the Gründerzeit burst in 1873, when a collapse of confidence brought an inevitable economic crash” (Fulbrook 131) from 1871 to 1890. In a time when the greater population was beginning to play a greater role in politics, Bismarck’s authoritarian style brought about a great deal of political and social tension because refused to consider any opposing viewpoints. When Otto von Bismarck was removed from power and imminent chancellorship in 1890, Emperor William II took power and implemented a far more…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war (1870-1871) established Germany as a powerful empire. Some of the worst fighting in the war was between France and Germany. Leading up to the World the two countries had experienced decades of tension. France was not getting fooled and could see that over the course of the 19th century the Germanic…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    states. Bismarck created universal male suffrage and the first welfare state in Germany. He manipulated Europe, and from doing that made Germany a world power.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Buber once said, “There are three principles in a man's being and life, the principle of thought, the principle of speech, and the principle of action”. If the idea of “thought”, “speech”, and “action” are so vital to one’s life, then not following an individual’s instincts nor taking any action to succeed in life results in conflict. These disputes can occur when individuals do not think straight and fail to realize there are consequences to their actions. Within Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, there are several factors that occur in the play that leads to conflict. For example, Juliet’s father, Capulet, arranges a wedding for her sooner than expected--even though she is secretly married to Romeo. In fact, conflicts are augmented in the play, especially when Romeo foreshadows his death as he fails to follow his instincts. In addition, Friar Lawrence foreshadows Romeo’s death since he predicts the outcome of their unwise marriage. Consequently, much of the conflict is created by Romeo and Juliet’s mutual outbursts, which is accentuated by the use of fire and celestial imagery. Ultimately, these avoidable disputes lead to their untimely demise.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck would cause the Austro-Prussian War or The Seven Weeks War, he wanted to oust Austria from Germany. After the Napoleonic War in 181, Germany was to be reorganized into a single confederation but the Germans had a different idea. One was a Großdeutschland (Greater Germany) that would be the multi-national empire of Austria, and the other was a Kleindeutschland (Lesser Germany) that would exclude Austria and be dominated by Prussia. Bismarck would like Germany to become a Kleindeutschland because he wanted Prussia to be the ultimate power in Europe and exclude Austria from everything. At the end of this War, Prussia accepted France’s mediation in order to come to peace with Austria so Prussia, this would mean Prussia didn’t take Austria…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays