Preview

Comparing Coworkers Against Each other

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Coworkers Against Each other
1. By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Overall I think that it can push /employees to work harder. Based on equality, appraisals should be based on a set of clear expectations, and employees should be ranked in a system that says they are falling below, meeting, or exceeding these expectations.

2. The equity theory focuses on employees being treated fairly in a work environment. This theory shows how employees react to the forced ranking method. People fill that the ranking method violates employees' rights

.
3. I think the best method would be to set goals, based on position expectations. The best way would be to give each employee action plans based on their position.
1. By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Overall I think that it can push /employees to work harder. Based on equality, appraisals should be based on a set of clear expectations, and employees should be ranked in a system that says they are falling below, meeting, or exceeding these expectations.
2. The equity theory focuses on employees being treated fairly in a work environment. This theory shows how employees react to the forced ranking method. People fill that the ranking method violates employees' rights.
3. I think the best method would be to set goals, based on position expectations. The best way would be to give each employee action plans based on their position.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 303 Week 3 Assignment

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many organizations - but not all - appraisal results are used, either directly or indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes. That is, the appraisal results are used to identify the better performing employees who should get the majority of available merit pay increases, bonuses, and promotions. By the same token, appraisal results are used to identify the poorer performers who may require some form of counseling, or in extreme cases, demotion, dismissal or decreases in pay. Whether this is an appropriate use of performance appraisal - the assignment and justification of rewards and penalties - is a very uncertain and contentious matter. This is probably what everyone thinks when they hear performance appraisals.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manager rating an employee more severely than their work performance merits will create a frustrated and disgruntled employee. Workers will resent the unfair assessment of their performance. The opposite is also true, if a manager rates an employee more favourably than their performance merits “cheats them and the department of the benefits of exploring areas for improvement and the opportunities for developing and coaching” (MacKenzie, 2013)…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would say to improve employees job performance will have to do with the leadership of the organization. The work policies would need to be examined, and the training practices would need to be reviewed. I suggest employee evaluations that properly document the company’s goal and bench mark where the employee is currently at is a good start, “Performance improvement plans contain specific areas, milestones and goals for immediate improvement. “ (Mayhew).…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam’s equity theory explains how employees might react to perceptions of both fairness and inequality (Fischer and Baack, 2013). Debbie’s decision to look for work elsewhere is due to the fact that her education level…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegel Case Summary

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such systems often include the use of rating or ranking levels in which each employee is positioned. These systems often use quotas to place a part of top performers at the peak level and the worst performers at the bottom level. Such a system is considered to eradicate those within the organization who constantly perform below par. The system is able to work if employees are mindful of the standards for which they are graded in advance, so they can make the required modifications. It can also remove those inside the organization who are either not appropriate for precise jobs or simply lack the skills and abilities to execute their jobs efficiently (Myers,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    business 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6. According to equity theory, how does an employee determine whether he or she is being treated equitably?…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Training Session Handout

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Make a clear target site- Where do you want your employee’s level of performance to be and by when.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, forced ranking performance appraisals is an effective way to judge production. I can see why people are against this method, saying that it kills the morale and that it creates a cut throat environment that doesn 't involve teamwork. But overall it can motivate a person to work harder and to make sure they aren 't in the bottom percentage in the ratio. The system puts employees into different categories: top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent, and the low-performing 10 percent. The managers rank employees against each other and then use the ranking to determine who receives a raise, bonus, promotions, and sometimes who gets fired.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case takes a critical look at using comparative methods to review and evaluate employees and exposes the impact of those methods on productivity and morale. "Forced Ranking" had occurred for many years at GE, instigated by the famed ex-CEO Jack Welch who had managers categorize their reports into three categories: the top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent, and the bottom 10 percent. This process has been shown to work well for about two years because it eliminates the least productive workers and strengthens the core team. After two years the benefits decline since the core team has now become stronger and eliminating the weakest links are no longer critical. After two years, the cut-throat mentality starts to take hold and employees know that they must portray themselves in the best possible light while playing up any negative factors about coworkers to help reinforce their positions. This behavior discourages innovation and leads to infighting as well as avoidance to risks which stagnates the company from growth and new ideas. This case goes on to look at best practices and techniques used by Yahoo who "made substantial changes to its rating system which compared employees' performance to an absolute standard rather to each other" (Ivancevich, Kinopaske, Matteson, 2008, p.135)…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Differentiation Framework

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This framework implements a process that requires managers to rank their employee performances into three categories; the top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent and the bottom 10 percent. It also requires managers to act on this performance rankings…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Individual Analysis

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Robbins, Bergman, Stagg and Coulter (2003) equity theory was developed by J.Stacey Adam. Campebell, Dunnette and Miller (1969) states the purpose of this theory is aim at employees’ assimilation from a job situation. Kaplan, Reckers and Reynolds (1986) notes these are outcomes, in relation to the efforts they put in, inputs, and then compare with others.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance appraisal is considered a key tool for managerial needs of today’s organizations and is the process by which organizations evaluate job performance. A performance appraisal system usually requires a manager to rate each employee’s performance according to performance criteria’s that have already been established over a period of time. Performance appraisal systems also provide a basis for planning improvement as well as means for determining merit increases, transfers and even dismissals. The most important purpose or goal of the appraisal is to improve performance and hence productivity in the future. Performance appraisals allow employees to see where they are at and managers can get valuable information from employees to help them make employee's jobs more productive. As a result of appraisals, managers’ control over work and results may increase, problems can be identified early, employees are motivated by being allowed to input into and own their objectives, enhances communication, objective feedback given back to employees, facilitates decision making in regard to pay scale and promotion, centralized record of performances.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The general function of performance management systems in organizations is for employers to manage employees’ performance and development by providing individual feedback on their performance evaluation to identify and plan measurable areas for personal development to ensure the organization’s strategic goals are being met (DeCenzo and Robbins, 2007). For years, many organizations provided appraisal type performance reviews to their employees that ranked them against other employees. This type of ranking system is problematic, as it is unfair to compare employees from different departments who’s primary goals may be different from one another and can viewed as putting down employees who may be unable to put in as many hours or as much effort as others who have only one set project at a time and can bog down to set higher numbers. If employee development is not properly measured and managed, the organization may find it difficult to meet their strategic goals. This in turn can create complications between mainstream workers and management, as well as the company, and their customers.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    code of ethics

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this approach, my employees will have exercises and tests based on meetings, and there will be rewards for achievements that are being made, such as an outstanding employee who has been on top of their inventory for example. Setting goals for my employees to accomplish in a set amount of time.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forced Ranking

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I would recommend a forced distribution list to organizations that are large in size and are looking to create a process oriented approach. About 20% of Fortune 1,000 companies and growing are using this approach. “Some say forced ranking is not only the best method, but an essential practice to turn a struggling company into a market-dominating one.” (Bates, 2003) This approach is the best way to identify your high performing individuals and also the bottom performs who should be helped out. The high performers should be given promotions, financial incentives and training to grow within the company. A leadership development program can also be started after identifying the high performers. The low performers should be put on a performance improvement plan to get help. Low performers are not automatically fired for being in one bracket – warnings should always be given first. It should be looked at as a development tool. Forced ranking engages the manager to provide assessments of employees and forces them to communicate the tough stuff with their employees. It holds the managers accountable for their workforce. “The great value of using a forced ranking process doesn’t result merely from plunking people into different buckets,” he says. “The payoff comes from the action that is taken with each person following the assessment sessions.” (Bates, 2003)…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics