After watching the Milgram experiment and the abuse that occur in Abu Ghraib prison. It is clear that leadership roles and authority position can both influence people to do thing that are harmful and bad to others. Leadership focuses on gaining people to follow them and is more based on free will. While authority has the power to tell people what to do. In the Milgram experiment many people back up why they continue administering shocks by stating‚ “Because an authority figure was telling them
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
In the Milgram experiment‚ a man picks random people to participate in an experiment. They believe that they are helping discover the roles of punishment on behavior. Although‚ this is not true. The participants themselves are the ones being analyzed. The experiment is to discover how far someone would obey an instruction of harming another person‚ despite personal conflict. The participant and an actor are places in a room and “get to choose” their roles of either teacher or learner‚ although the
Premium
Milgram experiment tells us about human and obedience. Humans are socially adapted to the society they live in and obedience is when a group humans follows the rule no matter wrong or right. Humans are usually obedient in most situations. That is due to teachings they receive. For example‚ when Hitler was killing groups of people‚ it was wrong; but the group of authority just listen to him and followed the rules. This situation was wrong and harmful but it was something that they just followed because
Premium Morality Human Crime
The Milgram ExperimentOne of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram‚ a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The experiments began in July 1961‚ a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust
Free Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram Stanford prison experiment
extreme by examining a study done by a social psychologist‚ Stanley Milgram‚ involving the effects of discipline. In the essay‚ "If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger‚ Would You? Probably"‚ Meyer takes a look at Milgram’s study that mimics the execution of the Jews (among others) during World War II by placing a series of subjects under similar conditions of stress‚ authority‚ and obedience. The main theme of this experiment is giving subjects the impression that they are shocking an individual
Premium Appeal to emotion Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Ciccone Eng-111 3 Aug 13 Milgram Obedience Study One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram‚ a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II‚ Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following
Premium Milgram experiment Adolf Eichmann Stanford prison experiment
person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act." –Stanley Milgram‚ (1974) This report is about obedience to authority which will take you into Milgram’s experiment and how this study applies to trainee police officers. The following experiment was designed to test obedience to authority conducted by the psychologist Stanley Milgram in 1961. He was motivated by the Jewish genocide in the second world war and tried to answer the question "Could
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram
Applied Philosophy‚ Vol. 18‚ No. 3‚ 2001 ‘Those Milgram Experiments’ Ethics‚ Deception‚ and 245 Ethics‚ Deception‚ and ‘Those Milgram Experiments’ C. D. HERRERA Critics who allege that deception in psychology experiments is unjustified frequently cite Stanley Milgram’s ‘obedience experiments’ as evidence. These critics say that arguments for justification tend to downplay the risks involved and overstate the benefits from such research. Milgram‚ they add‚ committed both sins. Critics are right
Premium Milgram experiment Psychology Social psychology
The Stanford County Prison experiment by Zimbardo (1971) supports Milgram’s study. Zimbardo (1973) experiment took place in a pretend prison house which was created in the basement of Stanford University. This was to investigate the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner/prison guard. Participants in both studies had a difficult time ending the experiment. The participants felt they did not want to appear inconsistent or leave the experiment. Participant’s behaviour was in control by social/professional
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
understanding of mass killing or genocide. a. Complex social forces- social forces and groups you’re in and how they affect your actions b. Evil actions due to societal forces/products c. Reasoning/justification- with milgram’s experiment—someone who holds a high respect for science‚ who wants to get the end result of the exp‚ will justify hurting the person…Nazi germany- rid of jew so there can be peace=REASONING…by killing them there would be no more unrest d. LIFTON:
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Philip Zimbardo