UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE La Verne‚ California Hollister Co. Business Feasibility Study Bus 581 – Managing in a Global Economy Dr. Omid E. Furutan Group 2 Wenjia Li Li Ji Kun-Yi Lin Hsiang-Yi Liu Xing Long October‚ 2012 Table of content Hollister Co. Business Overview 4 Foreign market expanding motivation 4 Three countries study: Japan‚ Singapore and Hong Kong 6 Japan 6 Singapore 9
Premium Singapore
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE – HOFSTEDE MODEL AND SCHEIN MODEL This essay/assignment is a solution paper on Organizational Culture. It reviews the Hofstede Model and Schein Model as well as tries to understand the the dynamics which influences the occupational cultures. This is a sample paper. The definition of culture remains quite ambiguous with researchers assessing it utilising different methodologies. The common understanding of culture is a way of doing things‚ or the norm by which a society organizes
Premium Organizational culture
Garden City: Doubleday & Company. Hofstede‚ G. (1984). Culture ’s Consequences – International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc. Hofstede‚ G. (n.a.). ’Cultural Dimensions Japan ’ [online]. Available at: http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_japan.shtml [Accessed 7 May 2009]. Hofstede‚ G. (n.a.). ’Cultural Dimensions Sweden ’ [online]. Available at: http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_sweden.shtml [Accessed 7 May 2009]. Hofstede‚ G. (1991). Cultures and organizations
Premium Cross-cultural communication Geert Hofstede Management
Intercultural Business Communication 2011 Abstract This report has reviewed the culture of Korea by using Hofstede‟s five dimensions of national culture (1997). Culture is defined and critique of the five dimensions is discussed‚ followed by the analysis of Korea culture that shows significant contrasting cultural values with Western countries. Moreover‚ stereotypes of Korea seem related to the power distance and collectivism culture‚ deriving the strong bond in nationalism and respect to
Premium Culture Geert Hofstede Cross-cultural communication
7.html. Hofstede‚ G. 1980‚ Culture’s Consequences – International Differences in WorkRelated Values‚ Beverly Hills 1980. Hofstede‚ G. 1983‚ ‘Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions’‚ in Deregowski/Dziurawiec/Anis (eds.)‚ Expiscations in Cross-Culture Psychology‚ Lisse Netherlands 1983. Hofstede G. 2006‚ Lokales Denken‚ globales Handeln – Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management‚ 3rd rev. edition‚ München 2006. Hofstede‚ G. n. d.‚ Geert Hofstede Cultural
Premium China Geert Hofstede Cross-cultural communication
Intercultural Communications have been of great interest to the Hofstede Centre for many years. In fact Geert Hofstede’s dimensions of culture have been the most widely disseminated of all theories. Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions are‚ “1) Power Distance‚ 2) Individualism or Collectivism‚ 3) Masculinity-Femininity‚ 4) Uncertainty Avoidance‚ and 5) Short or Long Term Orientation.” (Donald Baack‚ 2012‚ Chapter 2.4). “Professor Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how values
Premium Cross-cultural communication Geert Hofstede
Gerard Hendrik Hofstede (born October 2‚ 1928 in Haarlem) is a Dutch expert in cultural studies [GHW]. Hofstede (1980) surveyed 88‚000 IBM employees working in 66 countries and then ranked the countries on different cultural dimensions. His research resulted in four dimensions (power distance; individualism versus collectivism; uncertainty avoidance; and masculinity and femininity). In the beginning‚ China was not included in this study but later Bond and Hofstede looked at Chinese values. From this
Premium Geert Hofstede Cross-cultural communication Organizational culture
particular things different from one human group to another and therefore culture separates groups of people (Geert Hofstede). This applies to all kind of groups‚ such as national‚ but also organizational. In this assignment I will investigate to what extent the results of my personal cultural profile match the profile of my domestic culture (Dutch) using the 5 dimensions model (Hofstede‚ Hofstede and Minkov‚ 2010). Next to that I will discuss if the results of my cultural profile present me well‚ according
Free Culture Cross-cultural communication Geert Hofstede
Journal of Business Research 60 (2007) 277 – 284 Hofstede ’s dimensions of culture in international marketing studies Ana Maria Soares a‚⁎‚ Minoo Farhangmehr a‚1 ‚ Aviv Shoham b‚2 a School of Economics and Management‚ University of Minho‚ 4710-057‚ Braga‚ Portugal b Graduate School of Management‚ University of Haifa‚ Haifa‚ 31905‚ Israel Received 1 March 2006; received in revised form 1 August 2006; accepted 1 October 2006 Abstract Growth of research addressing the relationship between
Premium Culture
though there is no available data for the future‚ one can study current major findings of reputable academic sources within the cross-cultural field. To better understand the cross-cultural field‚ one must first define culture as a term. Geert Hofstede defined culture as “the collective programming of the human mind that distinguishes the members of one human group from those of another. Culture in this sense is a system of collectively held values.” Gesteland and Gesteland (2010) made a more relevant
Premium Geert Hofstede Culture Cross-cultural communication