Preview

America Needs More Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America Needs More Gun Control
violence, but that is not always so. For example, Switzerland has more per capita firearms than any other country in the world has lower murder and robbery rates than England, where guns are essentially banned. This is stating that Switzerland with more guns has less crime and that England with less guns has more crime. It all goes back to its not the weapon or gun that commits the crime! Gun Control only takes guns away from people that are law abiding citizens. It doesn’t stop criminals from buying guns. Law abiding citizens will most likely follow the laws and there aren’t many troubles with them but your criminals most likely to be the ones that buy guns illegally and will not follow the laws in order to register their guns. I think there is a misconception of the term gun control. Gun Control is supposed to be the government regulation of possessing and using firearms by private citizens. Instead the government is using it as a way to take the right of the people of the United States right to bear arms away. Criminals fear people who are armed. Victims who always use guns for their own protection were not as likely to be injured than if using any other form of protection. There are many reasons that people want to own guns. People use them for self-defense as well as protection for their livelihoods meaning that predators eating …show more content…
After the many studies that have been done there have not been any positive effects of the effectiveness of gun control laws. Most of the studies show a negative effect on gun control. Think from banning guns, you will just find more things like knives, clubs, axes, pipe, brass knuckles, bats or perhaps just beating people to death (stray). If a person wants to kill they can use a gun or any form they want. It’s not the gun that kills it’s the person behind the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime,” written by Alan M. Ruben apprises us that firearms have one sole purpose and that is to cause harm, meaning committing an injury, homicides, or suicides. Most people believe that owning a firearm gives the reassurance that they are protected and no harm can come to them. Ruben shows statistics that guns are not the most secures ways of bringing protection, but it can actually bring danger. “States with the highest level of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm murder rates and 60 percent higher total homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership”(Ruben). Gun ownership has shown that there is more danger being brought upon rather than protection. Statistics have made an estimate that not every gun owner is capable of having the responsibility of a firearm. “It is estimated that over 40 percent of gun acquisitions occurs in the secondary market. That means that they happen without any background whatsoever… guns show rank the second to corrupt dealers” (Ruben). Not every person who purchases a firearm are trustworthy, some may have a negative use instead of a greater purpose.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned earlier, Washington, D.C. and the United Kingdom adopted stringent gun control laws and it literally increased crime. If laws become too tough to handle, people will work their way around the laws. Owning or not owning a gun will not make people less susceptible to experiencing crime. In 2010, across four counties, 444 domestic homicides relating to guns were recorded. In only eight of these instances, the gun involved had been kept in the home. Furthermore, the instances when the gun in the home had been used, it is safe to say that it was used in self-defense. Most homicide victims are killed by weapons carried by the intruder (Lott, pg. 26,…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control would not help crime or murder rates because instead it disarms the law abiding citizens, therefore putting them at a disadvantage in defending there selves against criminals. The second amendment states that citizens have the right to bear arms. Guns have also been an American sporting tradition for years, and have saved many lives from rapist, murders and innocent civilians from the hands of criminals.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before addressing the viewpoints and the positive and negative effects, understanding what gun control is should be the first step. According to Dictionary.com, Gun Control is, "An effort to fight violent crime by strengthening laws on the ownership of firearms.” Guns are more likely to result in a death, than a knife or other weapons and people own them for the protection of items, hunting, or other reasons (Zimring). While it may be an effort to stop murders and injuries, it will not stop people from…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, before we get any further into this argument and things are stated, I must make it very clear – I’m a 100% against trying to put any type of force against our right by the Constitution to bear arms. The biggest question I have that pertains to this subject is always “Do people seriously think gun control is going to make any type of positive affect on this country?”…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe gun control laws do not stop gun violence because of the killing population. If the gun control laws stop the violence the death crime wouldn’t be so high. Criminals don't seem to care about the laws. Criminals continue to carry guns looking for trouble.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public Shootings

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page

    Guns throughout history resulted in violence from war, to public shootings, to fear itself when one is pointed directly at you. Police officers carry them to protect themselves and others, some hunt, some do the unspeakable and kill/rob.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun control laws can open up a whole other side to the distribution of illegal items. For example, when some types of guns are banned or possibly all types it is going to strengthen a market for criminals to make money and become more powerful. One way criminals can undermine gun control laws is to start make their own weapons and sell them to the public. Gun control laws only benefit non law abiding citizens because it would not be the first time they committed crimes to make money. No matter what kind of restriction is in place people will always find a way to get what they want.…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Is Bad

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control laws should not be strengthened, instead they should be enforced. Instead of making it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain guns, guns should be taken away from unstable individuals or people who should not have guns like criminals. The first reason why gun control should not be strengthened is that citizens have the right to own guns; it is one of those entitlements that makes the United States different from other countries. Secondly, criminals are criminals and that is why they are called criminals, they don’t follow the law; basically if a criminal wants a gun they will get a gun, legally or not. My third reason is that guns are used for protection. Strengthening gun control laws will not prevent violence, guns aren’t the only tool used to hurt people, and people will use other objects to hurt people if they can’t have guns. Without a gun, murderers will still murder people whether they use a gun, knife, baseball bat, or any other object, it doesn’t matter.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to gun related crimes, America is leading country. Because of all the guns that are in America, citizens have 5 time more chances of dying with a gun than any other country. On one year’s average “More than 100,000 people die in America with a gun” (Brady campaign). People who keep guns justify…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How many people do not fear being attacked by someone with a gun? The truth is that most people do share a fear of guns. This is the result of the lack of control over the possession of a gun. Anyone can get their hands on a gun no matter what they intend to use it for. Almost 30,000 people die each year in a gun related incident (Soyer 1). People are not careful enough in deciding where they place their weapon or how they use it. Because of its poor gun control system, America is in the top five in the world in death rate by guns. Someone who has a gun has complete control over a person without one, which leads to an increase in burglaries, rapes, and also in the number of gangs. Ronald Reagan once said, "As long as there are guns, the individual that wants a gun for a crime is going to have one and going to get it" (Gun 2). When put in the wrong hands, a gun can be a killing machine as demonstrated in many events in the world today. Although many people feel that they have a right to own a gun, they have lost that right because of many gun-related crimes that results in thousands of deaths and injuries each year.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Restrictions

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It has been found that countries with the most gun control have the higher crime rates. California has some of the strictest gun laws in the United States, and also has one of the highest crime rates. Up to 1981, Britain had one of the lowest crime rates involving guns in the world, but that year they started gun control. Gun control limited the access almost completely to handguns, and assault weapons. From 1981 to 1992 their crime progressed to almost 200 percent. Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in Europe, and Switzerland has laws that make every man age eighteen to fifty-six own an assault rifle. Men that age, are forced to serve in the military. The Swiss government makes them keep a rifle at home so they will practice with it and know how to use it. Their owning assault rifles is what keeps the crime rate low. The statistics show that gun control won’t help stop violence or crime but in fact with more control the rates increase. Chicago is the most violent city in America as of right now but it is also the city that has the most gun laws. People tend to blame violence and crimes on certain ethnicities. Houston’s population is very similar to what Chicago’s one is. Although their crime rate and violence is nowhere near as high as Chicago. Being so Houston doesn’t have all the gun laws that Chicago has. So statistics again are showing that gun laws are not the way to end…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gun possession

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws should not be very strict because law-abiding citizens have a right to protect themselves. Stricter gun control laws would make it more difficult for the segment of the population who would use them to protect their families. History has shown that criminals, on the other hand, will surely never have any problems with access to guns, no matter what the law. Passing stricter gun control laws will give criminals an even bigger advantage.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays