Analysis Of Daniel M. Wegner's The Illusion Of Conscious Will
Daniel M. Wegner in 2002 publishes a book titled The Illusion of Conscious Will. The book summarizes and exhibits a large amount of experimental research dating back to the 1950s and shows that we do not know how we work. They ultimately indicate that we have no freedom of will. All evidence consists of experimental research and studies in which human beings perceive the illusion of control, feeling that they, by their own free and conscious will, shape their events and their own behavior, while it is an illusion. The same actions, behaviors, and behavior determine something else - just the unconscious mental processes. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to demonstrate the ways in which such an experience arises - through a few examples and
…show more content…
Therefore, the action is described as something we intend to do and ultimately do, whether it is conscious product of will or not. Simultaneously with carrying out some action, there are also thoughts that warn us that we are ourselves human workers as the cause of such action. That is why there are different mechanisms that seem to establish relationships between our actions and our thoughts, and the experience of conscious voluntary action comes as a result of our interpretative system. Voluntary action is something a worker can do when we ask for it or when he or she deliberately decides that something will be done, actions can be started or stopped by the employee himself and their resources are conducted in specific parts of the brain and nerve pathways that in most cases differ of the paths that are the result of involuntary actions. John Searle in the book Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (1983) introduces the distinction between the previous intent and purpose contained in the action. He states that the thoughts we have at the time we do some action warn us of the fact that we are the cause of the action itself, but that all mental contents that accompany and support the causative action do not have to be the result of conscious processes at the time of action. That is why the intent should appear in consciousness at the time when we are moving, and beliefs, desires, and plans must serve as a benchmark for intent. It is precisely to us that the experience of a conscious will seems to be the causal workers of our
Therefore, the action is described as something we intend to do and ultimately do, whether it is conscious product of will or not. Simultaneously with carrying out some action, there are also thoughts that warn us that we are ourselves human workers as the cause of such action. That is why there are different mechanisms that seem to establish relationships between our actions and our thoughts, and the experience of conscious voluntary action comes as a result of our interpretative system. Voluntary action is something a worker can do when we ask for it or when he or she deliberately decides that something will be done, actions can be started or stopped by the employee himself and their resources are conducted in specific parts of the brain and nerve pathways that in most cases differ of the paths that are the result of involuntary actions. John Searle in the book Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (1983) introduces the distinction between the previous intent and purpose contained in the action. He states that the thoughts we have at the time we do some action warn us of the fact that we are the cause of the action itself, but that all mental contents that accompany and support the causative action do not have to be the result of conscious processes at the time of action. That is why the intent should appear in consciousness at the time when we are moving, and beliefs, desires, and plans must serve as a benchmark for intent. It is precisely to us that the experience of a conscious will seems to be the causal workers of our