Animal Testing Research Paper
Animal Testing is Animal Cruelty “A procedure which is likely to cause … pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.” This is how the government defines animal experimentation (Spriet-Pourra). Many products are currently being tested on animals. They, however, do not prove to be very accurate at all. This is causing much money to be lost, along with countless animal lives. Innocent animals should not have to undergo the pain from the testing they undergo, nor death for a slight chance of an accurate test. Animal Testing must be banned because it harms innocent animals, proves to be in several cases inaccurate, and has several alternatives. Animal testing is unethical and should be outlawed.
Through research scientists have proven that only five to twenty-five percent of the tests conducted on animals and human results are agreeable. The FDA, HHS, and the pharmaceutical industry are all aware of the fact that these tests do not prove that the product at hand will be safe for human use. For example a drug called Vioxx caused over 60,000 deaths in the united states alone, but the results from the animal tests showed that it would be safe. (Cimons).It goes without saying that animals obviously don’t have the same anatomy as humans, according to Spriet-Pourra when a medicine is being tested the effects on the animals have a great chance of being different than the effects on people. There are some animals that would actually be better participants for the tests undergone, in order to receive better results, but the animals used are usually chosen based on inexpensive cost rather than on reliability (Cimons).
According to PETA (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”), colleges, scientists, and the government have developed and our still developing alternatives to animal testing. Not only are the alternative testing options cheaper and some simpler, they are also much more humane. Another plus to using these tests is that they are more reliable. One replacement test
Through research scientists have proven that only five to twenty-five percent of the tests conducted on animals and human results are agreeable. The FDA, HHS, and the pharmaceutical industry are all aware of the fact that these tests do not prove that the product at hand will be safe for human use. For example a drug called Vioxx caused over 60,000 deaths in the united states alone, but the results from the animal tests showed that it would be safe. (Cimons).It goes without saying that animals obviously don’t have the same anatomy as humans, according to Spriet-Pourra when a medicine is being tested the effects on the animals have a great chance of being different than the effects on people. There are some animals that would actually be better participants for the tests undergone, in order to receive better results, but the animals used are usually chosen based on inexpensive cost rather than on reliability (Cimons).
According to PETA (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”), colleges, scientists, and the government have developed and our still developing alternatives to animal testing. Not only are the alternative testing options cheaper and some simpler, they are also much more humane. Another plus to using these tests is that they are more reliable. One replacement test