Preview

Callicles Gorgias

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Callicles Gorgias
Rebecca L. Hunt
Stickiest Point #1 1. THE CLAIM: “The man who’ll live correctly ought to allow his own appetites to get as large as possible and not restrain them.” –Callicles, Gorgias 491e-492a.

2. CALLICLES’ ARGUMENT: Callicles claims that one should fill his appetite as much as possible. Socrates’ view on a happy life requires self mastery which means that your appetites and emotions are controlled and you mind manifests order. Also, Socrates’ ideal happy person would not do what is morally wrong. Callicles argues that if you live a life like Socrates wants, you are living like a corpse or a stone. Callicles believes that “living pleasantly consists in this: having as much as possible flow in” (494b). To truly be happy, one needs to be constantly filling his appetite to the maximum capacity. This is not possible for many. The people who cannot fulfill their appetites are apparently embarrassed and “their own lack of courage leads them to praise self-control and justice” (492b). According to Callicles, the rules created by the weak “enslave” the more naturally gifted men. For the ones born into power, Callicles believes that they should defiantly feel shameful that they let the talk of the people and the laws that rule them stop him from filling his appetite.

3. CRITICISM: Callicles is wrong to think that one should fill his appetite constantly and to the fullest. This may seem like a pleasant life but it is defiantly not a fulfilling one. You need more goals and ambitions that are not just centered on what you want. . One could argue that everybody does not have appetites that are bad and selfish, but Callicles is defiantly referring to the self-indulgent ones. Callicles theory is similar to Darwin’s “survival of the fittest”. Both believe that the strongest creatures will rule and take over the weaker ones
Callicles is also wrong in saying that the strong should do whatever they feel and the weak need to quit holding them back

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates beforehand disproving Gorgias and Polus in The Gorgias, now takes on a rival who he deems qualified enough: Callicles. Here, they discuss the value of temperance and the indulgence of pleasures. Callicles remarks to Socrates, “In the rightly-developed man the passions ought not to be controlled, but that we should let them grow to the upmost and somehow or other satisfy them, and that that is virtue” (Plato 74). Callicles says that to allow growth and indulge in your desires is real virtue. A man who is slave of his own restraint cannot be happy. According to him, satisfying longings is natural and even noble, but because the weaker cannot attain this and are ashamed of their own weakness, they reprimand intemperance and instead praise…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within philosophy, the idea that power results from physical and situational force is known as moral realism, of which Callicles is essentially the founder. Simplistically, as Callicles asserts within "Gorgias," the powerful, and subsequently just ruler, is one who exerts force to maintain influence. Thus, following this line of thought, might makes right. Throughout the dialogue, however, Socrates repeatedly argues that temperance overrides brute force. He suggests instead, that control over our desires, such as the desire to rule according to individual belief rather than the majority's benefit, is true power. He also makes it clear that power hungry, inconsiderate leaders have no true strength, because according to Socrates, a ruler who cannot control his own convictions has no control in any other aspects of life. However, despite the philosophical logic of these assertions, leaders even today unthinkingly rely on armies and weapons to enforce their personal (and not always authentic) views of justice.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One conversation between the parties was that of how a truly just state would look like and Socrates answers by declaring that a state might find justice when the overall happiness of the state has priority of desire to ones selfish ambitions. Socrates also says in reason people want to do what their desire bids them achieve and be trained in such a way that they would not care about anything but what their position in that society would have them do (The Republic, 376c-377e). This leads on to Socrates being asked to describe in detail how the laws of such a state would be where justice is to be found. Socrates says that for him to explain such a place to them would cause such humor to the group because his ideas are quite contrary to the ideas of people in the society in which they live(The Republic 450d-452e). He explains that three ideas that would push could be implemented that could make up a society that may contain justice. One is the common education of men and women another is women and children held in common the third is the idea that philosophers should rule as kings.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, I would to talk about the definition of sensible appetite, the largest aspect of our tripartite soul. It is the seat of all our various desires for food, drink, sexual gratification, and other such pleasures.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gorgias had been arguing that rhetoric was almost synonymous with power, as a rhetor can convince anyone to do anything. This, to Gorgias and Polus, is true power and will lead to one’s happiness. However, from the measly two pages or so of argument, Socrates is able to prove sound doubt as to whether this is true or not. This is all to back up Socrates’ earlier claim that “both rhetors and tyrants have the smallest power in the cities” (466d4-5). By using the argument of justice, Socrates is able to prove that doing what is unjust is not good for anyone, especially the person committing the injustices.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The selected text that will be examined in this essay is Oedipus the King and Plato ‘Crito’. Oedipus and Socrates play a major role in their own lives when it comes to their intelligence in resolving issues that are given to them. In contrast, there is a difference between our world and the Greek culture, which seems to be very alienating. The following discussion examines that Oedipus and Socrates stage mythical knowledge and autonomy in their presentation of themselves to the audience. It shows what implications self-reliance has for the authority of Oedipus’ and Socrates’ traditional beliefs.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, for Socrates, no one would choose to do injustice since no one would choose what is more painful and bad. However, according to Vlastos, there is no suggestion here that the conclusion represents one of Polus’ standing convictions. Since the conclusion does not follow from anything Polus had said so far in this discussion, Socrates ‘mounts the above epagoge to win Polus’ acceptance of conclusion on the spot’. For Vlastos, Polus can reject premise 4 when Socrates tries to apply pleasure and benefit to laws and practices; and if Polus has sensed the shift to these more abstract objects, no less than that of bodies, colours, shapes, and sounds, the pleasure to the actual or ideal beholder is what accounts for admirability, he would have stymied Socrates. And it is true that it would be flawed to compare the more abstract things like laws and practices to bodies, colours, shapes and sounds. Therefore, Socrates refutation is not sound, as one of the premises can be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is in this phase that one begins to understand the origin of their actions. One may think they are pursuing something for one reason, when really there is an unconscious desire that is the true cause of the action. In Plato’s Gorgias (488B-491A), Socrates uses his question and answer technique to the extreme. Socrates continuously asks Callicles, in what may seem like a redundant process, to further explain his idea of the terms ‘better’ and ‘superior’. It is clear through this questioning process that Callicles has many discrepancies in his understanding that weaken his overall…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In book V, Socrates says that philosophers are “insatiable in their approach to learning” (475c). Adeimantus continues and says that those who are brought up in the philosophical life “become quite queer, not to say completely vicious” (487d), and the men in Aristophanes’ Thinkery are quite queer indeed. Socrates also presents the philosopher in the image of the “Ship’s Captain”, in which the philosopher will not rule unless he is asked (488a). Plato and Aristophanes both would most likely agree that the philosopher seeks out knowledge in all things, but they do not seem to agree whether that is a good thing or not. Socrates in The Republic seems to want what is best for the city politically, which he believes would be the philosopher-king. Aristophanes uses Socrates’ lack of political involvement to show that what is best for the city is to follow ancient custom and education in order to continue the traditions of the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato V. Augustine

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alcibiades is depicted as a prominent Athenian statesman, a successful orator, and a well accomplished military general. On top of such admirable prestige, he is also quite physically handsome. With this knowledge in mind, he seeks to seduce Socrates into a lover-beloved relationship in which he is willing to allow Socrates access to his body in return for the knowledge that Socrates possesses [Plato, Symposium, 217a]. To this, Socrates claims that Alcibiades seeks “gold for bronze” [219a] for the beautiful body is nothing when compared to the value of truth. Socrates is praised for his “invulnerability to the power of money [219e], his indifference towards base pleasures such as hinder [220a] and cold [220b], his bravery in the midst of combat [220d-221b], as well as his general patience and focus in the pursuit of knowledge [220c-d].…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument in the Apology

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The conclusion that can be made about these premises is that Socrates is not the one who is corrupting the youth because he is a specialist in this field. In addition, the real corruptors of the youth are the greater population of Athens because they are not specialist on teaching wisdom. What important about this conclusion is that even though Socrates uses horses as an example he…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acting on Emotion

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sophocles designs his plays to instruct his audience members to behave morally correct. People’s actions are ruled by their emotions (jealousy, suspicion, anger, pride, and love) and it leads to negative effects for them. But when acting in a sage demeanor, it gives evidence to a person’s character. Sophocles writes his characters to be ruled by their emotions and to teach people to behave in a prudent demeanor. Sophocles designs his plays to have the people of authority act in an immorally correct fashion.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that Socrates emphasized the importance of the mind over the relative unimportance of the human body? Socrates is one of the best Philosophers that has helped make society’s cultural and intellectual development. Without him, history would not be the same. He said “I know that I know nothing”. However, he believed that one could gain knowledge by being taught. This statement comes from Plato’s Apology. Socrates believed that wrongdoing and behavior that was not good was a result of ignorance. The one thing that Socrates stated to have knowledge of was “the art of love”. Research tells that Socrates acknowledges that there were two women besides his mother that influenced this believe and works. One of these two women was a witch and priestess from Mantinea who taught him about love. The other women was a mistress of a Pericles who taught him the art of rhetoric.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics