Preview

Difference Between Animal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Animal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane
Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Common animals used in research labs are rats and mice. Animals are subjected to experiments that deal with drug testing, disease infection, maiming, and some painful invasive procedures. There are fairly high casualty rates before the studies are concluded and many animals are disposed off after the study is completed because they are no longer of use. Common lab procedures that require extensive training are anesthetization, intubation and euthanasia. However, these procedures can potentially cause a lot of pain and discomfort when performed improperly.

Chemical testing on animals has led to the discovery of many life-saving treatments and cures to infectious diseases. Some animals benefit from the result of animal testing for illnesses and their treatments. There is not an actual adequate alternative to testing on a living individual other than human primates and nonhuman primates. However, technology is evolving and there are now a few other alternative methods that can replace the use of animals. These methods also deem to be less expensive than animal testing.
…show more content…
Animals are similar to humans in some ways. They both are living creatures that respond to their environment and pressured conditions, however, the anatomy of animals is very different from that of humans. Therefore, these experiments can have various harmful effects on them that a human may not experience. Medicinal and cosmetic chemical products may pass animal testing, but are not completely safe. If there is no way to be completely sure, is it really worth potentially harming these defenseless

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In these experiments, there are tons of sources of error. They do not live in a human-like environment, instead they are confined and distressed. Secondly, researchers deliberately infect the animals with diseases they would not normally contract, after being healthy to begin with. Many drugs have varying results between different animals, and animals and humans. For example, penicillin kills guinea pigs, but does nothing to rabbits. According to the food and drug administration, 92% of drugs that pass animal tests fail human tests. Some chemicals that are harmful to animals are okay for humans, as well as the other way around. Animals are being sacrificed for experiments that don’t even have accurate or useful results. If the regulations for the environment test animals live in are enforced, it can reduce some of the factors that make an experiment not a fair…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Outline

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal experimentation, for the benefit human beings, is not only cruel, it is also useless; safer alternatives to animal testing should be kept today in order to preserve the beauty of the environment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are alternatives to animal testing. One way is artificial human skin. It produces better results and is safer. It is made from human cells and is grown in test tubes or plastic wells. It gives better results than animal skin. The skin still shows the reaction to the substance and it isn’t harming anyone or anything. It is a better and safer way to test substances.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be re-used in subsequent experiments. Here is a selection of common animal procedures:…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the California Biomedical Research Association, “Scientists use animals to learn more about health problems and to assure the safety of new medical treatments. Medical researchers need to understand health problems before they can develop ways to treat them. Some diseases and health problems involve processes that can only be studied in living organisms.” However, there are other ways to test cosmetics and medicine. For example, a possible way to find results for eye irritation and corrosion is to measure using three-dimensional human equivalent systems like EpiDerm and SkinEthic. This can put an end to cosmetic and medical animal testing. Someone with a different perspective may say that animals like chimpanzees and mice share at least 98% of DNA with humans. This means that these animals are prone to many of the same health issues that humans may have. On the other hand, this does not mean that we can kill or murder harmless animals. Animal testing is toxic to animals and violates their…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not only medical products and procedures have been tested on animals. All make-up products are tested on animals before it go on the market. They are tested to make sure no irritation or rash is created wile using the product. Testing everyday products not only help keep buyers satisfied it may help them not die in the process of using the product. More satisfied buyers mean they will be more likely to buy more stuff which helps the economy.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing helped scientist and doctors find a cure for polio in 1965 and helped treat diabetes in 1921. Animal testing could even help doctors find a cure for diseases such as cancer and all different types of diabetes. Thus, many humans rely on animal testing to survive and to stay…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, animal testing is harmful and cruel to animals. When they are not being injected or smeared with some substance, lab animals live in extremely stressful conditions. In fact, a 2009 study showed that lab monkeys experienced stress-induced psychosis - basically, they were being driven insane (neavs.org). Though the Animal Welfare Act requires a committee of scientists to…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many tests take a few months or even years to conduct causing the price of experiments to be unbearably high. According to Hsi.org some tests could cost hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. This money being used is a waste if barely any of the tests outcomes work on humans. The money being used on animal testing could go towards helping people with struggling with poverty or even finding new ways to test for medicines and cures.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is no secret that in today's science world, animals are used for medical research. Many scientists believe that animals are a necessity to the science world, but for many years, animals have been mistreated by scientists for the “good of science”. Animal testing should not be done because it is cruel and inhumane for animals, animals are completely different from humans and therefore make poor test subjects, and animal medical testing is a waste of money for the government and taxpayers . For instance, animal testing is cruel and inhumane.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the many reasons that animal testing is wrong is that it is abuse to the victims. Not only mental abuse for the animal but physical abuse as well. Many animals result in alterations in behavior, physical appearance, and in many cases death. On the website DoSomething.org it cites¨Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.¨…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe animal testing is cruel, however, there are other methods to use that don’t involve animals. The article “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”, says “In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cons Of Animal Testing

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In my opinion I believe that it is okay to a certain extent to be testing chemicals on animals because it is helping to create medicine which helps humans in the long run but I believe that companies and organisations shouldn’t have the right to test chemicals and substances on the life of an innocent animal for the sake of cosmetics, which in my opinion is not needed for anything helpful.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testibg

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Living in this world, there are numerous organizations debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. Being such a controversial subject it leaves civilization today with both many pros and cons to animal testing, with some people for and some against. However, animal testing does result in medical advancements and less human-based experiments it still is an unethical way of researching and practices animal cruelty. Some experts in the subject believe there are alternatives to testing on animals that would provide a more realistic way to experiment.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays