Discuss The Responsesofchildren
•Suggestionsfromchildren how toimprove the situation inthe institutions of socialprotection
Afterpreviously preparedprotocolfor conductingfocusgroups, childrenliving in institutionsforsocialprotectionanswereda few questions. Regarding the question of howit is possible toimprove relationsbetweenchildrenwithin theinstitutionwereceived severalresponses,which arecategorizedinto fivegroupsinterms of content. The firstgroup includesthe answers thatputthe responsibilityoftheemployee in the first place, andwithin thisgroupthere arefoursubgroups(first subgrouprefers toexpertknowledgeof employees and theirownauthority toaffect thebehavior ofchildren;second refers to thesanctioning ofviolentbehaviorby employeesin the thirdgroup includesthe responsesofchildren …show more content…
The thirdgroup includes the responsesofchildren who find the responsibility of poor relationsbetweenin the children themselves, …show more content…
Almost withoutexception, allemployeesrespondedthat they lovetheir workand more thanhalf ofthatlove their work too much. This informationshouldnot be tooencouraging,because it showsthat employeesdo notchange their minds because of the difficulties theyfaceat work, andthat their commitment toprovideassurance thatthey willengagein solvingproblems thatarise, includinghere theproblem ofviolence is sufficient. However, morethan half ofthe teacherswould changetheir ownwork, andprimarily because ofpoor statusthatthisprofession provides in the societyas well as smallsalariesandthe inabilityto progressin their ownprofession.
Inrelation to theissue ofprofessionalcombustion in theworkplace, mostemployeesbelievethat the phenomenon ofcombustionoccursinemployeeswho work directlywithresidents ofover15years, whileasmaller portionconsidersuch combustion may occur2-3years after directlyworkwithchildren, andothersdenythat their workcomestocombustion. In orderto reducecombustionprofessionalemployeeswithin thefocusgroupshadsuggestions like reducing working hours to 6hours, increasing the numberoftechnicalstaff totake careof hygiene, reducing the numberofchildrenineach group, andengagingtwopermanentteachersfor each group(preferablyof different
Afterpreviously preparedprotocolfor conductingfocusgroups, childrenliving in institutionsforsocialprotectionanswereda few questions. Regarding the question of howit is possible toimprove relationsbetweenchildrenwithin theinstitutionwereceived severalresponses,which arecategorizedinto fivegroupsinterms of content. The firstgroup includesthe answers thatputthe responsibilityoftheemployee in the first place, andwithin thisgroupthere arefoursubgroups(first subgrouprefers toexpertknowledgeof employees and theirownauthority toaffect thebehavior ofchildren;second refers to thesanctioning ofviolentbehaviorby employeesin the thirdgroup includesthe responsesofchildren …show more content…
The thirdgroup includes the responsesofchildren who find the responsibility of poor relationsbetweenin the children themselves, …show more content…
Almost withoutexception, allemployeesrespondedthat they lovetheir workand more thanhalf ofthatlove their work too much. This informationshouldnot be tooencouraging,because it showsthat employeesdo notchange their minds because of the difficulties theyfaceat work, andthat their commitment toprovideassurance thatthey willengagein solvingproblems thatarise, includinghere theproblem ofviolence is sufficient. However, morethan half ofthe teacherswould changetheir ownwork, andprimarily because ofpoor statusthatthisprofession provides in the societyas well as smallsalariesandthe inabilityto progressin their ownprofession.
Inrelation to theissue ofprofessionalcombustion in theworkplace, mostemployeesbelievethat the phenomenon ofcombustionoccursinemployeeswho work directlywithresidents ofover15years, whileasmaller portionconsidersuch combustion may occur2-3years after directlyworkwithchildren, andothersdenythat their workcomestocombustion. In orderto reducecombustionprofessionalemployeeswithin thefocusgroupshadsuggestions like reducing working hours to 6hours, increasing the numberoftechnicalstaff totake careof hygiene, reducing the numberofchildrenineach group, andengagingtwopermanentteachersfor each group(preferablyof different