GEN/105
Learning Styles The student completed the “Multiple Pathways to Learning” assessment, and the result was logical-mathematical (Carter, Bishop, & Kravits, 2007, p. 41). The student also completed the “Personality Spectrum,” and the result was organizer (Carter, et.al., 2007, p. 46). Through their descriptions these two results coincide with each other. Both describe a person that is organized, understands material logically and sequentially. Study Techniques To function best in a distance learning environment, the student will use the suggested study techniques to maximize her learning potential and thrive academically. Specifically the idea to organize learning material logically and sequentially will greatly improve the learning ability. Also writing outlines of the information will help narrow down specifics that need to be memorized for assignments. Further, knowing what is expected and required from a task will assist the student in achieving success. This can be accomplished by listing via bullet points the tasks given in a syllabus. Possessing the logical-mathematical intelligence and having an organizer personality significantly enhances one’s ability to learn through orderly, spelled-out material. …show more content…
Improving less developed intelligences may seem difficult.
However, using the suggested study techniques may yield a positive result. For example, the student scored low in the musical intelligence. It may benefit the student to “take music breaks” (Carter, et.al., 2007, p. 44). The pupil could go to a quiet area and listen to various songs that may help set the mood for the student to focus on what she is studying. This may assist in clearing the mind to become ready for information to be absorbed. Also to help memorize certain knowledge the learner may break down the information and rap it back to herself. This could improve the retention of the data the student is
studying. Learning Strengths Knowing one’s own learning strengths is vital to success in the academic and career world. Having the ability to know skills that will help with retention and application of learned knowledge will greatly increase one’s achievement. When a student knows her best practices for learning this puts her ahead of those who do not. For instance, if a pupil knows that using flash cards enhances their memorization of an assigned task, this will increase their chances of scoring better than a fellow classmate who has not realized a study technique that correlates with their intelligences. Students who recognize learning strengths in classmates will succeed academically. Having the skill to delegate shared assignments appropriately will reduce work on others and produce positive outcomes. Should a student who is not strong in logical-mathematical intelligence be assigned a task completely associated with numbers, they will most likely have a difficult time completing the task. However if the same student is strong in visual-spatial skills, a task that has to do with perhaps graphing should be assigned instead. This will more than likely produce encouraging results ending in a good grade. As students progress in their collegiate academics, they more than likely will have to work in groups. It is critical to their success that they employ the skill of knowing one’s learning strengths so that they may collaborate on assignments. Delegating the appropriate task based on skill and strength will only produce positive outcomes. Distance learning takes dedication and organization from a student to generate good grades. Having the skills to identify one’s own learning strengths will help in this success. Moreover having the skills to identify others’ learning strengths so that collaborative work is accomplished will only help students to improve their leadership skills. Delegation is easy to do but that does not mean that it will be successful. Doling out task to only qualified individuals will produce positive grades.
References
Carter, C., Bishop, J., & Kravits, S. L. (2007). Keys to college studying: becoming an active thinker (2nd ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.