First, it could prevent or even eliminate disease genes and prevent them from passing them on to forthcoming generations (Doc. 3). In past research, people were questioned and their responses were recorded. After all the numbers were added up, it showed 83% of the subjects disagreeing to making a baby more intelligent (Doc. 4). However, only 50% disagreed to reducing the risk of serious diseases (Doc. 4). Why are these numbers so drastically different? The answer is easy; it is less accepted to change the appearance or smarts of a kid than to prevent a troubled future. Picture this: a parent with a history of Cystic Fibrosis decide to have a child. This genetically inherited disease that affects the digestive system is possibly deadly or can complicate the life of a case (OI). If the chances are almost already determined for the child to contract the disease, does that make it approved to genetically prevent
First, it could prevent or even eliminate disease genes and prevent them from passing them on to forthcoming generations (Doc. 3). In past research, people were questioned and their responses were recorded. After all the numbers were added up, it showed 83% of the subjects disagreeing to making a baby more intelligent (Doc. 4). However, only 50% disagreed to reducing the risk of serious diseases (Doc. 4). Why are these numbers so drastically different? The answer is easy; it is less accepted to change the appearance or smarts of a kid than to prevent a troubled future. Picture this: a parent with a history of Cystic Fibrosis decide to have a child. This genetically inherited disease that affects the digestive system is possibly deadly or can complicate the life of a case (OI). If the chances are almost already determined for the child to contract the disease, does that make it approved to genetically prevent