Gun Control Cons Essay
Gun Control: Worse For Us Than We Know
Almost everyone living in this country should have witnessed such debates. Some people might not have listened to a formal debate, but an informal gun control debate is being carried on by many groups and individuals. It is very unlikely that someone has not listened to one. Recall the occasions when you were traveling or waiting somewhere hearing the neighbors discussing gun control pros and cons. These conversations are also gun control debates in the wider sense of the term. After all, a debate does not have to be a formal one. The question where the gun control debate is heading to come from the fact that there have been innumerable rounds of this debate, but no conclusion seems to have been reached. Gun control facts show what has been happening around us. Therefore, gun control although it sounds like a good idea at first, in the long run, it is much worse for the country.
First off, criminals will always find a way to get guns if they are restricted or if they are not. Gun crime statistics show that guns are used in about 60 percent of the homicide crimes, but how do the people react to these kinds of gun death statistics Also, “nations with stringent gun control have substantially higher death rates”(Harvard). If people are going to accept these facts passively, then gun control debates will end up only as an academic exercise. Gun crime statistics should make us sit up and evaluate the gun control pros and cons. Does the fact that guns are increasingly being used for committing murders not contradict the argument of the pro -gun lobbies that guns are for protection? “Criminals will do anything, even kill, for their guns” (Harvard). In this case the crime rate will skyrocket due to the criminals killing for their guns. Another shocking detail is that the number of suicides is higher in regions that have a lower number of gun owning people. So, gun ownership can be a way to deter the suicides. On the other hand, most
Almost everyone living in this country should have witnessed such debates. Some people might not have listened to a formal debate, but an informal gun control debate is being carried on by many groups and individuals. It is very unlikely that someone has not listened to one. Recall the occasions when you were traveling or waiting somewhere hearing the neighbors discussing gun control pros and cons. These conversations are also gun control debates in the wider sense of the term. After all, a debate does not have to be a formal one. The question where the gun control debate is heading to come from the fact that there have been innumerable rounds of this debate, but no conclusion seems to have been reached. Gun control facts show what has been happening around us. Therefore, gun control although it sounds like a good idea at first, in the long run, it is much worse for the country.
First off, criminals will always find a way to get guns if they are restricted or if they are not. Gun crime statistics show that guns are used in about 60 percent of the homicide crimes, but how do the people react to these kinds of gun death statistics Also, “nations with stringent gun control have substantially higher death rates”(Harvard). If people are going to accept these facts passively, then gun control debates will end up only as an academic exercise. Gun crime statistics should make us sit up and evaluate the gun control pros and cons. Does the fact that guns are increasingly being used for committing murders not contradict the argument of the pro -gun lobbies that guns are for protection? “Criminals will do anything, even kill, for their guns” (Harvard). In this case the crime rate will skyrocket due to the criminals killing for their guns. Another shocking detail is that the number of suicides is higher in regions that have a lower number of gun owning people. So, gun ownership can be a way to deter the suicides. On the other hand, most