Preview

Gun Control Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1312 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Essay
No to Gun Control; Yes to the Second Amendment The second amendment of the constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (cornell.edu). The purpose of our founding fathers making this was to ensure the protection of the individual person. Banning semi-automatic weapons will have several negative effects on the well being of this country. The government cannot protect every individual from the evils of murder; murder that preys upon the defenseless. It is nearly impossible for a person to own a fully automatic weapon; therefore, banning semi-automatic weapons would merely take away the protection that citizens, according to the second amendment, have the right to own. When law abiding citizens have lost their source of protection, the only owners of semi-automatic weapons will be criminals; criminals who do not follow the law; the law designed to protect those who follow it. The government will not be there when a murderer breaks into a house and kills a whole family because they were not allowed to own a gun. Different gun control policies all around the world will prove true that criminals are less likely to approach a person who most likely owns a gun themselves. Semi-automatic weapons should not be banned because removing guns will not stop the killing, removing the criminals will. In the meantime, let law abiding citizens protect themselves when the government cannot.

A semi-automatic gun solely means it fires one bullet every time the trigger is pulled. This includes basically the majority of the guns owned by citizens except a revolver, a pump shot gun, and a bolt action rifle. The process in obtaining any of the previously stated fully automatic weapons is both long and very expensive. They are also as, if not more, dangerous as semi-automatic weapons. Semi-automatic guns are being called assault weapons which of course makes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ultimately, I agree with the side of only law enforcement having guns. Although, I know this can only happen in a utopia, it is still worth the try. I feel if the government works hard and tries to find these illegal underground gun stops, we might be safer then each individual having a gun.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms, or keep weapons. This means that our forefathers made sure that legally we would be able to have the right to protect ourselves. According to the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, “Self-defense is a fundamental right.” (Pros). Almost half of Americans agree with this statement, and 67 percent of people who own guns claim that…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is how life might be in some years. With restrictions as low as they are for such a dangerous item, this is how life may become.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens have been bearing arms since the beginning of time, but in today’s time it is becoming more of a problem. Having the proper gun control would play a major part in decreasing the crime and murder rate in the US. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What would be going through your mind if you were in a restaurant and a mad man came in and began slaughtering people right and left including you family (Swasey 174)? Would you be thinking if they would ban guns this would have never happened? Probably not! What you were probably thinking is if I had a gun on me I could protect not only my family but also the others being slaughtered. This same scenario was on the mind of Suzanna Gratia as written in Elizabeth Swasey essay ”NRA Woman’s Voice”(174). People are starting to see a gun as an object of death and destruction, and not what they are intended to be.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several strategies that can dramatically reduce cases of gun violence. First, there are no reasons for citizens to purchase any type of semi-automatic or assault weapons. Instead, they should only be able to purchase handguns for protection purposes. Allowing citizens to purchase assault weapons only translates into providing support for people that have wrong intentions. Because these weapons are easily available, people who intend to cause harm can obtain one and carry out their plan. This is why it is very crucial to ban citizens from purchasing weapons that can inflict substantial damage. Although handguns can also cause great damage, they are less…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NRA does have some good reasoning about it. “In a country where a large number of criminals are armed, denying a citizen the right to gun ownership makes him vulnerable” (Xaxx). This is true, but, how would that make us any safer. Suddenly everybody would have guns, criminals and law abiding citizens, either way the rate of murders or injury will increase because it was by use of guns. I do respect the concept of the NRA, of trying to protect our rights, but the bigger picture should be, trying to protect people from harm. If guns were in the possession of…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The person who holds the gun is who harms the other person. If the government is trying to prevent any more casualties than there absolutely has to be, just by banning guns they are not going to succeed. What the government should do is when someone tries to apply to get a concealed weapon permit or just a license to own a weapon the should have to go through a series of tests to test their mental status in case the doctors have not diagnosed them with any mental illness that might be apparent. These mental status test should happen to an existent of being tested about every two years or so to renew their license. The people of the U.S should be allowed to have weapons as self-defense but the people should use a proper gun safety and use a gun cabinet to store their guns in and keep it out of the reach of children. I also think that the Second Amendment was put into place for a reason, we the people of the United States are letting our government have too much power and that can be very consequential we are already starting to feel the negative effects of letting this happen. If we let the government have as much power as they have and even more we are going to lose our rights because once the…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Violence Arguments

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my research, I found that most of the attacks are carried by handguns not the semiautomatic weapons and opponents argue that even if we restrict or ban some…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Essay

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Research from Dr. John Lott states that with a higher gun ownership rate come fewer mass shootings. From 1977 to 1999 right-to-carry laws decreased the frequency and severity of mass shootings. The terror attack in Orlando and the shooting that killed Christina Grimmie both occurred in gun-free zones. One of the main reasons murderers do that is because they don’t want to be stopped by an armed civilian.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the United States Government pass laws that would prevent the production and sale of semi-automatic assault weapons?…

    • 1718 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is ridiculous to even think about banning "assault weapons" because there is no such thing as an "assault weapons". This is a term the media has created to make semi-automatic firearms sound scary. A semi-automatic firearm is a firearm that can shoot a cartridge(or bullet) and automatically chamber another cartridge. Although some firearms looks scarier than others this doesn't mean they are any more dangerous. People buy these "scary" looking guns for home protection and hunting. We cannot even look at "assault weapons" as the culprit in this situation. "Assault weapons" like the AR-15 are only used in 24.6% of mass shootings nationwide. Handguns are used in 47.9% of mass shooting nationwide (according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation). How can anti-gun activists blame "assault weapons" like the AR-15? We should consider our options. Should there be an increase in background checks when purchasing a firearm? Or maybe we should address the issue of mentally ill and PTSD diagnosed citizens? Anti-gun activists are walking right around the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays