Preview

Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment
The Bill of Rights recognizes and protects the citizens of America's’ natural, basic rights. What happens when the rights that the government are supposed to be protecting, begin to be ignored? Fourteen words protect all of our guaranteed rights as citizens of the united states-“...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” That is why gun control violates the second amendment.
“By restricting gun ownership only to law enforcement officers and the military, the government violates individuals’ rights to possess firearms that they might need to defend their basic freedoms.” When the Founding Fathers wrote the Bill of Rights they knew that giving the government our guns would be the equivalent of tearing the constitution in half. Guns are the only things that protect our rights. It’s what gives the people power, and it’s also what protects people.
“Between Friday night and Sunday evening(May 2-4 2014), 28 people had been shot in Chicago. Which...shows an improvement over the previous weekend, which tacked on more than 40 gunshot victims to the city's climbing statistics.” Chicago has one of the most strict gun laws in The United States, the entire city is a gun control utopia. Chicago is proof that gun control does not work. Gun control and the number of people shot in Chicago is
…show more content…
It only benefits criminals and the people who want to hurt the average citizen. Above all gun control ignores the second amendment. The solution to all of this is gun freedom, for guns to be bought, advertised, and sold like any other product. Most importantly for there to be no special taxes of guns and ammunition. A prime example that this works is Iceland. They are ranked 15th on the global list of gun ownership rates. Violent crimes are basically nonexistent in Iceland, in 2009 they only had four deaths that involved guns. Iceland is living proof that gun freedom

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is also supported by the U.S. Supreme Court which said, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” This quote shows how altering the laws would be the opposite of what the Second Amendment states. Also according to the Declaration of Independence, our unalienable rights are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and, “that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This means that whenever we are in perilous situation we can defend ourselves to secure our right of life. Also, “banning guns will take away yet another piece of our liberty,” according to balancedpolitics.org. Eventually this will lead to having more of our rights taken away and result in tyranny. This is why we must not alter the gun laws we have…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitutional right quoted above all else is the second amendment: the right to bear arms. Many have been harmed directly and indirectly through legal fire arms. The second amendment is put up to debate after numerous hate crimes and school shootings. What if stricter restrictions had been implemented concerning gun purchases, the guns might not have been…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is supposedly the law of the land, right? Well America will soon find out how true that statement actually stands. “The right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” is part of the second amendment developed by the forefathers of this country (constitutioncenter.org). In the recent debates about gun control, the government is talking about taking away the rights that amendment gives citizens. This has recently become an issue because of all of the public shootings and crimes around the U.S. While something should be done to stop violent crimes and shootings, guns are not the issue and people refuse to understand is that it’s the person behind the gun that pulls the trigger not the gun itself.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One issue that many Americans have been very concerned and had a debate on is gun…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the US constitution allows citizens to bear arms, Adults should have the right to concealed carry. This is shown by, the right to concealed carry handguns is guaranteed by the second amendment by the US constitution (Should).This shows that at Dec. 11 a case struck down an illinois state law that broadly prohibited carrying a gun. Then they said the must involve a right to have a concealed gun in public, to have it ready for use and self-defense. Which says why you should have them. In addition to that, the government cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens. This is saying that…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has made it possible for citizens to have a right to bear arms and protect themselves. Guns laws from state to state have been debatable on the lower and high levels of congress. Guns laws are put into place to regulate the use, ownership, and, transport, and firearms accessories. Gun laws are regulated by the ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms). Guns laws will interfere with workplace and public safety at any time firearms are present. Some organizations forbid employees from carrying firearms on their property or in their parking garages of the organizations. A number of other states (including Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, Wisconsin)…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have freedom and rights that no one can mess with, unless the government bans guns. “The second Amendment to the constitution is limited to protecting the state militia’ right to bear arms” (Buckley1). If we ban our citizens guns then we are violating their right to the second amendment. We will being restricting a form of freedom for them. “The basic right of the american citizen is to bear arms, whether to kill game, or to wound and kill human beings bent on murder or rape” (Buckley1). The right to bear arms is important because of this reason. We can hunt and we can protect our people, without that right the criminals would have the advantage not, not the citizens. “Our founding fathers saw guns to be such an important line of defense…” (Chadduck1). This is why the Second Amendment was made. It is the right of an american citizen to keep a gun for safety reasons. Gun were made to harm the enemies targeting us, so do not take that away from the…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been a proven fact that the states with stricter gun control have increased the crime rate by a lot. That is happening because some people still have guns and the government are disarming everybody else which makes it easier to rob store gas stations and banks. “Although guns killed 35,957 people in 1995 the guns didn’t pull the trigger people did.”(Schmittroth 3) Most of those killings were from having gun control. If we got rid of gun control it would reduce the amount of crimes that go on in the United States. Most of the guns in the United States protect lives more than they take lives. But that only happens when there is no gun control. And handguns are perfect for women to keep in there purse to have for self-defense. But the government is trying to pass gun control which will leave most of the women defenseless. Which bad thing is that approximately 200,000 women in the United States use guns to protect themselves from sexual crimes every single year. And guns prevent more injures than they…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Essay

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Gun control has been on the forefronts of debate since the 1960’s when there were some high profile shootings. The increase of gun violence since the 1980’s has just increased the argument over who should be allowed to own and carry weapons. The Second Amendment is the biggest stumbling block in this debate because people interpreted it differently. The one side argues that it states that we have the right to bear arms, but the other side says that it doesn’t pertain to us anymore in the modern era. Politicians love to use the idea that removing legal guns will drastically reduce suicides, assassinations, gang-violence, school shootings, accidental child deaths, and general murders. They don’t consider the fact that someone that wants to kill themselves will do it anyway they can, or a college kid trying to tear up his school will just blow it up if he cannot find a gun. Criminals vary rarely use registered guns to commit crimes, they use illegally acquired weapons. Gun control only protects the criminals and the image of the government’s control over the people. The controversial movement to disarm people has infringed their natural right to self-preservation(self-defense), which takes away their true freedom. The Founding Fathers believed that freedom and no gun control goes hand in hand, which is why they wrote the Second Amendment. “To disarm the people… was the best and most effectual way to enslave them” (Henry, 1788) Patrick Henry’s quote sums up gun control. So, why after all these years have we forgotten his words? History has proven Henry’s words to be true over and over, but the nation keeps disregarding it. Americans need to act urgently on this matter, because if no action is taken on gun control, we will become another ‘Hitler’s’ Germany or ‘Stalin’s’ Russia, without…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws take away the right to self defense and take away their feeling of safety. If a person doesn’t have a gun, when attacked they have a higher chance of dieing. “A small women is armed with a knife and the large man has a knife, he is more likely to win, but if she has a gun she gets to live another day” (Cooke, 26). This is an example of why the 2nd amendment is needed. “The 2nd amendment does protect the individual right of law- abiding,…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control essay

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A definition of gun control has different meanings to different people. A general statement is it is designed to restrict or limit the possession, production, importation, shipment, sale, and/or use of firearms (Wikipedia). There are many options including Assault rifle bans, large magazine clips ban, and criminal background checks. To a liberal who fears lifeless objects as being evil, it means walking on the bill of rights to assuage their fears, and avoiding or at least hampering the people, in their ability to lawfully keep and bear arms. To a person who believes in the right to keep and bear arms, it means a sharp eye, a steady hand. To a potential criminal it means it will be harder for them to purchase a gun legally. Whichever choice you choose it still affects the second amendment. The second ammendment is, a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed upon. I think gun control should be limited to prevent felons from obtaining and better tracking of guns. But I think that every American that is not a felon should be able to carry a weapon and defend them. John Adams recognizes the fundamental right of citizens, as individuals, to defend themselves with arms, however he states militias must be controlled by government and the rule of law. To have otherwise is to invite anarchy (2008 Lillian Goldman Law Library).…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Take for instance Washington, D.C. which in 1976 instituted some of the nation strictest gun laws. During the next 25 years they were at the top of the list for cities with the highest homicide rate per 100,000 people. Homicides committed with a firearm, and the murder rate, actually increased by 51% during that time; meanwhile the national rate of murders in the rest of the United States committed by firearms dropped by 36% ("Crime…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays