Life Without Parole Essay

The discussion of committed crimes young adults from seventeen and younger should be given life without parole has become controversial on whether or not it should be mandatory or retained. This controversy has spread worldwide and authors are giving their opinions on the topic Do children as young as eleven deserve to be charged as adults without parole? Rhetorically, it all depends on the heat of the case and whether it was intentional or not. . Moreover, trials go off the eighth amendment to rightfully convict someone. The eighth amendment states,” No excessive bail, excessive fines, or no unusual or cruel punishments,” where suspects will not be charged with excessive amounts of fines to pay and overly expensive bail. Consequently, a
The sick part of it all is that there are teenagers out in the world that want to know what it feels like to kill someone and they plan out their scheme to get the feeling they crave. The article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” that we read in class has a horrendous case that was intentional. “When a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in suburban Chicago, she was pregnant with their first child”(1,1). The teenager didn’t have any sympathy when the new mother begged for the life of her unborn baby, but he shot her anyways. On the day of his trial, his friend testified and said,” he just wanted to see what it would feel like to shoot someone”(1,1). What? This isn’t a teenager, this is a physiopathological killer who intentionally murdered an innocent family that was just beginning to sprout. He deserves to rot in prison for what he had done. He doesn’t even deserve to be breathing the same air we do. The author, Jennifer Jenkins wrote,” There are advocates who wish to minimize these offenders culpability simply because of their age”(1,4). No. Teenagers who intentionally murdered for their own well being do not deserve to get an easy punishment for what they done. No matter the age of them, they should get the same punishment as
Whether it’s the victim’s family or the killer himself. That’s all it takes, is for some teenager to murder someone and their life to come crumbling down. In Jenkin’s article, it specifically says,” There are no words adequate to describe what this kind of traumatic loss does to a victim’s family”(1,8). Advocates don’t understand the undesirable pain families feel and sometimes the pain never goes away and they don’t recover from the loss. The pain is sometimes unbearable to handle and a victim’s family might harm one of themselves and it’s ok that the convict gets away for what they did? “The nationwide campaign to end JLWOP has spent millions for these convicted murderers to be set free”(2,9). This is saying that criminals should be let go for what they have done just because they are too young to spend the rest of their life in prison, but what about the family members who have to live with the death of their loved one for the rest of their lives. What about their justice? What about the victim’s justice? Was he or she not important enough, that you would give their murderer the benefit of the