Preview

National Security Agency: A Loss Of Privacy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
662 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Security Agency: A Loss Of Privacy
Personal freedom is a right that we are fortunate to have today. It allows us the right to our own privacy and personal affairs. National security aims to keep us safe and protect our welfare. So the question is, would you be mad if you found that someone was secretly reading your texts,phone calls and email and storing it all ? Because that's exactly what the government is doing. This heightened security began after the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001, and has only grown over the years. Creating better security was obviously a necessity, but in doing so they have directly violated our 4th amendment. All our data has been stored through metadata and programs such as RETRO. The NSA has too much control, they see everything …show more content…

"The Marina metadata application tracks a user's browser experience, and gathers contact information. So what this data does is it records anything a user does online, such as browsing history and websites visited, email activity, and even some account passwords. So basically this builds a picture of your life. A loss of expectation of privacy in communications is a loss of something personal and intimate and will have broader implications. This quote by Nat Hentoff explains that we are losing our personal information for the ‘ sake of safety’. But further along the line the government is going to want to continue searching through our private information. In a way i believe that this violates our amendments. In the Bill of rights the 4th amendments states : The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated unless of course there's probable cause. And lot of the times there is no probable cause, the government is just spying on innocent people. Taking away these simple rights is threatening. This invasion of privacy is actually an attack on the american people not cracking down on the bad people. So in conclusion privacy is more important than security. Although due to current happenings it does raise questions on why security wouldn't be our top priority. All the things we do requiring the internet are being recorded, listened to and collected. Privacy is one of our human rights and the government is taking it away. Its starts off by looking through little things such a phone calls but it will eventually turn into something else - something

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has complete authority to monitor calls, emails, finances and records without their permission which is complete violation of the civil rights that each citizen of America is entitled to also the language that is used in the patriot act pertaining to this segment is very vague and challenges the human rights of the…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thoughts of those looking into the affairs of the NSA think the government took a great idea, and honestly the only idea with today’s technological warfare, and got greedy with how much information they have collected and need to be watched very carefully. The most important information for any human being is the information we choose to keep private, it can be the most devastating information in the wrong hands and the United States Government is holding that exact information in bulk, with your name on a yellow folder.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ethics are “moral principles that govern behavior” (Oxford). The cornerstone of American democracy is offering inherent rights and freedom, but the term privacy must be evaluated. Recently, America has become a country that has drawn much unwanted attention to its government to due reports of the National Security Agency storing information gathered from people’s phones without letting the public know. Before going any further into research, it should be noted that as an American, there is certainly an inherited bias throughout the paper. This problem with the NSA has unearthed many feelings from the public and also politicians who either support or go against the storage of phone records. Since Edward Snowden released hard facts that the NSA was indeed storing phone records, people seem to either have a big problem with the bulk collection, or no problem at all (5). The NSA claims that colleting phone records is necessary in order to protect the world from possible terrorist threats, but civil libertarians say that because the government is not legally required to destroy the information once it has been collected, it is therefore an invasion of privacy (5). It is clear that in order to keep everyone safe, America not only has the right, but also the full responsibility of gathering intelligence in any way possible…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How important is your privacy? Most people would agree having privacy is a huge concern, especially when it involves personal business. In recent breaking news, Edward Snowden, a 30-year-old high school dropout, who worked for the NSA, released private information to America. He announced the NSA is tracking citizen's phone calls and monitoring emails. Most people in the U.S. were very frustrated once the information went viral. Many people believe Edward Snowden should not have released the information he knew. However, if he did not reveal the secrets of the NSA, many citizens in America will still be clueless.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government should worry citizens, by hiring people to hack into their lives. The National Security Agency, NSA, is “inside” everything from phones to major websites like Google and Yahoo. The NSA is responsible for code breaking and getting information from phones and the internet. The NSA has headquarters in the United Kingdom as well. They try to focus overseas instead of domestically to prevent any serious crime and to defend the UK’s economic interest. Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens, violates the fourth amendment, and made programs to “hack” us, the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many of strategies for diminishing the injustices associated with surveillance. There are strategies at an individual level such as educating the public, engaging in civil disobedience, civil procedures, and guerilla tactics that can help one achieve justice. There are also strategies at an organizational level to help seek justice such as educating the public, civil actions in court, civil disobedience, and violence or threat of violence.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have a quote from the National Security Agency, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.” Resolve: The benefits of domestic surveillance by the NSA outweigh the harms. From Oxford dictionary, I have a definition of privacy: freedom from unauthorized intrusion. The 4th Amendment from the constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." According to Cornell University Law School, the 4th amendment “prohibits generalized searches, unless extraordinary circumstances place the general public in danger.”…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Considering the point of whether amendments protecting us from the government is just a huge illusion, I believe this statement to be true to a certain extent. Yes, especially with privacy, the NSA has violated our personal…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Earlier this month, The New York Times reported that since shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001 the National Security Agency, whose mission is to monitor the communications of foreigners outside our borders, has been focusing its futuristic spy technology on Americans." The spying that should shock everyone all over the US. Now people cannot even talk on the phone or talk online without some government official spying all over the place. The first amendment is only a tool; if no people use it then the government does not have to follow it. The government wants to protect people by listening to everyone trying to catch terrorists, but it should not be at the cost of freedom. "The electronic eavesdropping was conducted under orders from the president…" The president is a major source to this dilemma. He is taking away the rights of people who are not there to stop him. "The president himself even summoned Times officials to the White House to persuade them not to go ahead with the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is your opinion on this issue? Justify your view in a short written report…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Privacy

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a U.S. law called the Patriot Act was passed under the Bush administration. The goal of passing this law was to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of law-enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Grabianowski). The privacy of the American public was first questioned in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had “been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth” and was “using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity” (Greenwald). This article referred to a secret…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of Privacy

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Privacy is important to me because it affected me in many ways throughout my lifetime. In my opinion, privacy means no one can interfere with your rights without your consent. Also being away from other people to spend time alone time with yourself. Privacy is a constant problem at home because my parents do not let me lock my door or even go out with friends during the night…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays