Preview

Nietzsche's Daybreak Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche's Daybreak Essay
In Daybreak, Friedrich Nietzsche states that “morality is a hindrance to the acquisition of new experiences and the correction of customs: that is to say, morality is a hindrance to the creation of new and better customs: it makes stupid” (Nietzsche 18). Considering the importance placed on morals, how is it that “morality makes stupid?” Within the context of morality, Nietzsche has two major themes: slave versus master morality and the destruction and creation of a new morality. Through an exploration of these themes, one can better understand exactly what Nietzsche means with this contentious quote. Nietzsche argues that there are two types of morality: that of the master and that of the slave. Master morality places an emphasis on “power, …show more content…
The blank slate of the child enables an individual to not only reject traditional moral values, but to create their own individual form of morality. Within the context of the creation of new values, it is important to understand that Nietzsche is not necessarily amoral. Nietzsche does not argue that an individual should not have any morals, but that they must reject traditional slave morality in order to reach a higher state of being. Morality becomes a source of stupidity when it is based on blind faith in the herd morality. In Nietzsche’s view, morality can only help the individual to progress if it is specifically created and embraced by that particular …show more content…
Though some of us may try to live a life of isolation, in the end it is rarely an attainable or even desirable way of life. I believe that Nietzsche’s personal bias from his failed relationships and depression had a strong influence on his highly individualistic view of morality. By experiencing the company of others, our own views can be challenged which can result in them by strengthened of entirely discarded. It is impossible to experience personal growth within the confines of a vacuum. Recognizing this, there often times are people who drives us to forms of herd morality, and I believe Nietzsche has a point in that we should try to isolate ourselves from those who inhibit our personal development. There is great value in surrounding oneself with people that help us in the journey of individualized moral development as they can aid in this process

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Nietzsche’s First Essay in “Genealogy of Morals,” he analyzes the history and evolution behind the meanings of “good” and “bad” and, later, “good” and “evil.” He begins by recognizing that, originally, goodness was determined by the “noble, powerful [and] high-stationed” elites, as opposed to who was “bad”—the commoners, the “low-minded…plebeian(s)” (113). This split between both classes creates a “pathos of distance,” where the upper-class seizes the opportunity to “create values and to coin names for values” (113). In other words, what was “good” meant what was characteristic of the higher class, meaning that only the actions the Aristocratic classes qualified as good behavior.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophers, however should “not point to this falsification of the truth because no philosopher has yet been confirmed right” and this “truth” can be interpreted as their “prejudice” (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886, 27). Later in the Chapter Nietzsche gives a overview of stages of morality in human history: the pre-moral period, in which only the consequences of action matters, the moral where the focus is on the origin rather than the consequences of action. Eventually, Extra-moral it the last stage and looks at the intention of an individual’s action. If individuals recognize these drivers that shape human action, they can overcome the restrictive characters of morality (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886, 32,33). At the end of the chapter The Free Spirit, Nietzsche predicts that free spirit is possible but he also describes the challenges (human instincts and intentions) to his vision of free spirit among a new generation of philosophers (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche questions if the opposite were true. He proposes that what we call good may actually be detrimental to our livelihood and what we call evil is superior in value. Nietzsche claims that in the past, we have taken the worth of values as something that is given. Therefore, the origin of morality, good and evil have to be examined and interpreted in order to determine…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ability for a class of people to scheme and plot their next movie to destroy their enemy. Nietzsche elaborates further, stating that those with the slave morality complex, or those that do not murder for example, has succumbed to this complex. This is due to the fact that since the slave morality concept of “good”, has intertwined itself in with the slave morality. He goes on further to include concepts such as “justice” as having essentially succumbed to the slave morality, and how in their viewpoint, it is best to let things sort themselves out. Which in turn from the standpoint of Nietzsche, is succumbing to weakness. The world that Nietzsche paints is one of only right and wrong, and not much of a middle ground for alternate…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But Gilson does believe in following Christian faith which has been around for thousands of years and it should never be changed but only added too. Gilson knows there is a problem with the current modern world, between the choices of “enforcing moral code whose justification it does not itself recognize or to stand by and watch the gradual disintegration of public morality.” Nietzsche believes you are able to break old forms of education. He believes that “to break this education, he must help the youth to have its say, he must light the way for its unconscious resistance with the clarity of concepts and turn into a conscious, loudly consciousness" state of mind. This means both Nietzsche and Gilson both believe that they can improve education by helping the youth of modern…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Beyond Good & Evil”, Friedrich Nietzsche analyzes the role of a figure he creates called the Free Spirit. In today’s technological day and age, the world is filled with followers and people who simply go with the grain as opposed to going against it and forgoing what everyone else is doing. On the off hand, those who do go against the crowd evidently stand out, and arguably, they live a better life in search of their own greatness as opposed to the concept of the ‘common good’. In the book, the Free Spirit is plays the person who goes against the grain, seeking knowledge that no one else even dreams of. The Free Spirit stands above the masses, and in effect nears making substantial progress for society, against their moral intelligence.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A central idea in the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche is the idea of the master-slave morality. The master morality, the morality of the nobility, covers courage and strong will. In this mindset, one only interprets morality, classical virtues, the good and bad, but not the evil. Conversely, the slave morality accepts humility and the herd mentality, viewing morals as good and evil, vilifying the master. In his works, Nietzsche argues that the fatal issue with society today is the prevailing slave morality.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the German philosopher, Nietzsche there are two types of morality that coexists. He states that there are master morality and slave morality. According to him slave morality values the actions of one whether they are good or bad. For instance, virtues, consequences, and immoral behavior. As for master morality that values our pride, strength, and honor.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the Genealogy of Morality, Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) believed that there are two types of morality mixed in the psychology of human beings (individual) and higher civilisation. This molarity originated from slavery (“will of Power”- where man was exploited by another man) in the past. Even though it does not exist in society today, the morality is still present. Slave-morality values kindness, humility and sympathy are regarded as "herd-morality" (Nietzsche, GM, and Preface 6). Master-morality values independence, nobility, honour and power are regarded as "beyond good and evil" (ibid).…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sartre Vs Nietzsche

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His argument is that an absolute morality forces values on everyone in a society which advance the interests only of one group of people and which for the remainder are ?life denying?. He holds that the traditional distinction between good and evil has arisen from the perspective of a group he calls the ?slaves?, and insists that, like everything else, morality is ?conditioned by perspective?.[2] He protests against the negative way in which traditional codes of conduct are framed, and the way in which they promote ascetic values like sin, humility, and self-denial. The starting point of Nietzsche?s morality is thus essentially negative?it is based on the errors he thinks have contaminated traditional thinking about morality, and on his diagnosis of the state of European…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's views run along similar lines. Not only morals do pervade life spheres, but, they derive their normative force values with which they are associated . However, this values are not the “ground zero” of morality: as Schacht puts is '[…] for Nietzsche […] all normativity is ultimately of extra-moral origin. For Nietzsche that ultimate origin – the Ur-source of all normativity – is to be found in the basic disposition he takes to be operative in all that transpires in this world, which he calls "will to power" and which expresses itself in the various more specific dispositions informing our affective constitutions and lives' . Hence, will to power - a will of self-overcoming, a primordial impulse which appears in all beings - is what Nietzsche presents as the integral moral source, and genealogy is the practice of tracing the origin of morals back to the will to power.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n this respect, according to Nietzsche the value of a certain morality is to be determined in the light of the question “does it further life or does it stultify life?” . Accordingly, we find in The Genealogy of Morals that ‘[…] all events in the organic world are a subduing, a becoming master, and all subduing and becoming master involves a fresh interpretation, an adaptation through which any previous “meaning” and “purpose” are necessarily obscured or even obliterated’ (GM 12). Insofar as our values are an expression of the Will to Power – that is, a will to self-overcoming - then our values are involved with a will to become master of ourselves. Subsequently, it follows that one set of values is the more perfect the more empowers our capacity…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, to understand Nietzsche, it is important to realize that his view of Christian morality is that it is a tool – a club swung by the weak to subjugate the strong. The truth value is irrelevant. The weak people did not reverse morality because they thought it was true – they did it because it served them. It empowered them to gain the upper hand over those who were physically or financially more powerful than they were. When the weak lacked land, horses, swords, armies, or money, they restrained the strong with threats of eternal damnation, or by painting the strong as someone who is diseased with sin – someone who lacked the virtues of gentleness, obedience, or meekness. I think Nietzsche wanted to liberate Europe from the chains of Christian morality so that it could escape its problems and once again enter into the real morality – the morality of…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays