No Pay Many Interns Say No Story Analysis

Internship gives students more than just work experience, it gives them new life. The author of the article, “No Pay? Many Interns Say, ‘No Problem’” written by Jennifer Halperin, which published on April 2010 from AOL News argued that there are many benefits from taking internship even though many interns would not earn money, but the thing they will receive after that is more valuable. Halperin is superior of creating this piece of writing in order to attract audience who are mostly college students. In this article, Halperin uses the three Rhetorical Appeals of logos, which included several logical facts, pathos, namely showed on her sentences point of view, and ethos from numerous credible sources to persuade her audience of college students,
She began her article by using reliable reference from the New York Time contented about different aspects of people to argue among internship. After that, she asserts about her perspective which relevant to internship, particularly mentioned about positive effects that interns will get while they are working. She continues to make her argument become more credible by using some strategies of logic and facts as well as emotional messages. Halperin makes her opinion based on believable hypothesis in which she experienced from previous interns she talks to. Moreover, quotations from essential personnel and organizations are applied in many cases of her writing as prominent evidences to support her opinion including the claim from the former unpaid intern who is currently has a very good position in his job. Finally, Halperin finishes her essay by motivating readers along with inviting them to join an unpaid internship which usually based on her duties as an internship
Identically on the logical appeal, Halperin should present some statistics, for instance, the percentage of unpaid interns and paid interns in comparison. Eventually, it can be the qualitative valuable such as the level of satisfaction from unpaid interns. This fact will strongly support her article because in reality, several group of audience might not prefer to read every sentences if it is not attractive. Furthermore, it could be recommendable for her to show less credible experts. Intensely, more people may not create any different from audience’s attitude. In another way, the level of persuading reader would be constant. The final suggestion of this article regarding to content. Indeed, the detail in this piece of writing is quit repeating when Halperin keeps mention about positive side of internship again and again, but only little different style of narrating. So she should improve her presenting style otherwise there would be a probability that audience will turn away from reading this article. To sum up, Jennifer Halperin is recommended to advance her writing by providing number of statistics, mention less people, and make detail of the article more