Good morning/afternoon students and teacher/s,
Today I’m here to tell you why the national NAPLAN testing should be abolished. NAPLAN stands for the National Assessment Program- Literacy and Numeracy and it is a test designed to assess the academic performance of students.
Many people that NAPLAN testing should be called off; I also agree with this.
Firstly, NAPLAN interferes with the school curriculum. So much importance is being attacted to this test that other subjects in the school course become forgotten as teachers focus more on NAPLAN. In preparation for this ‘so important’ test, teachers centre their teaching around certain topics and other subjects that are just as essential to a students learning seems to be deemed as insignificant. Much time is also put into the preparation for NAPLAN. The national survey conducted by the University of Melbourne found that in four months before NAPLAN, teachers had already started holding practise tests, while some were holding DAILY tests. The time spent being wasted on NAPLAN could have been put to better use, such as focusing on the curriculum, and actually benefitting the students and their learning. Restricting the time means that teachers are trying to force a large amount of content onto students without properly teaching it. The schools curriculum so that students are learning the correct and necessary material, but the interruption caused by NAPLAN means that teachers fail to do this.
Secondly, NAPLAN does not aid children’s academic development. NAPLAN was designed to be an assessment test so that parents can gain an understanding of their child’s academic performance, schools can see an overview of how well their students are doing and what areas need attention and also provide the government with a report of Australia’s education. Normally, being able to receive feedback like this should be beneficial to a students education, but not in the case of NAPLAN. The individual results from NAPLAN are usually released around September, and the overall results even later. At September, the school year is close to ending and teachers have generally covered most of the curricular. Receiving NAPLAN results at such a late date means that review of results and changing of content being taught is pointless.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Step 4: With the plastic syringe draw out the gases of the spongy mesophyll tissue and infiltrate the leaves with sodium bicarbonate solution and then pour the solution into the appropriate cup. By doing this it will cause the leaves to sink.…
- 722 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the story Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller the character Biff asserts to his family that “we never told the truth for ten minutes in this house” which is completely true. The Loman family is constantly lying and making an array of different excuses in order to escape the truth that they are just a “dime in a dozen.”…
- 390 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Teachers and schools should be held accountable, but not judged by some test that is a blanket test. This act takes away the ability of teachers to actually be able to teach, they just instruct to what is on the test. Students learn at different levels; this test hurts those students that may not learn quick as the others or learn in the same way. The NCLB is an even bigger problem in areas such as Chicago, Atlanta schools with children that come from poorer families and do not get the help they need at home.…
- 468 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of assessment is to check and monitor learner’s progress and development, finally setting a framework to provide feedback to inspire learners.…
- 1153 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
I disagree with California Ban on the word ‘Redskins.” I disagree because Native Americans are the only one making it a bad name. No one else is using Redskins in a bad way or even thinks of it in a bad way. All reskins means is that someone skin has a red tint. It’s names of many schools and some famous sports teams and they shouldn’t have to change their name because Native Americans think of it in a bad way. Everyone who has had to change their name because of California ban should get to change it back. Schools and sorts teams now have to change their mascot, their name and if it’s a school they might even have to change their company. I disagree with California’s ban and I’m sticking with that.…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After the Fukushima nuclear reactor disaster, radioactivity and radioactive contamination have become a topic of our conversation. In the initial stage, people were terrified by it and spread bad gossip about it although they did not know what it is exactly.…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
intimidation, a master of supplication .... in an interview, it's ingratiation and self-promotion that make the real difference.'' (75)…
- 452 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
a.i) Government assistance, or welfare, is a very broad term. There are many different welfare programs available in the United States e.g., food stamps, cash assistance, and government housing. Currently there is mass debate, in courtrooms across the U.S., regarding the legality and morality of pre-assistance drug testing. This report is intended to familiarize the reader with the history of welfare reform; the histories of drug testing in regards to assistance eligibility; and persuade the audience to vote yes for mandatory pre-assistance drug testing.…
- 1704 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The No Child Left behind Act requires strong accountability for results by requiring that schools meet an adequate yearly progress (AYP) or minimum standards. States must develop clearly defined goals and then assess individual students to see if schools are meeting these goals. (The NCLB allows school districts and states to exempt 1% of students from the usual assessments. This 1% represents about 9% of those with disabilities and includes those with the most severe disabilities.) This positively affects diverse learners because it allows the NCLB to monitor how effectively the school districts teachers and methods are working.…
- 437 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Since NCLB in 2002 saw a large rise in the use of standardized testing America’s PISA ranking actually fell from 18th in math to 31st, science and reading also fell similarly(Walker). Sadly America is raising a very unintelligent generation, who is so worried about learning how to take tests well that they forget to actually learn. We can’t really trust these large testing companies to gauge our education system’s effectiveness when they themselves have repeatedly had major issues with faulty scores on tests. Legislators from across the country should come together to not only save our country money, but to protect this country’s future, the next generation’s…
- 766 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This is highlighted by the teachers spending less time on students who are underachieving due to NAPLAN focus in lessons. A large percentage of teachers surveyed suggested that literacy and numeracy were not improving, and that they were changing the way they taught towards a more teacher focused lesson, which in turn lowered student enthusiasm to learn in class. This article was published in ‘The Australian Educational Researcher’ journal by Greg Thompson who the senior lecturer at Murdoch University, and Allen G. Harbaugh who is also a lecturer at Murdoch University. This contributes to my other articles by taking a different perspective (the teachers) on NAPLAN…
- 485 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
believe it is wrong to allow just a single test to decide whether an entire…
- 1352 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This is a two part series on getting ready for end of year testing. Today we will focus on preperation and tips next week will we focus of favorite after testing activities.…
- 237 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
When the NCLB first came about the intentions were great. According to the United Stated Department of education the NCLB was to be “based on stronger accountability for results, more freedom for states and communities, proven education methods, and more choices for parents” (2004). As a result of the NCLB every student enrolled in a public school is required to take an annual standardized test from third through eighth grade, and once in high school. Students are then broken up in to specific groups, such as "African-American" and "economically disadvantaged." As researched on the NEA (National Education Association) website, each group (including special education students) now must have a passing rate of 95 percent and by 2014 that percentage should increase to 100 percent. NCLB therefore, forces the teachers to lower and/or alter their primary educational goals by enforcing standardized tests which must be reported to measure their AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress). If schools do not meet the requirements, then the school is put on the "needs improvement" list and the district gives students the option of transferring to a…
- 1335 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays