Player Piano Kurt Vonnegut Analysis
Technology is an application of scientific knowledge and is mainly used for industrial purposes; however, it is now used in a lot of different things apart from industrial purposes and its uses of applications keep growing. Industries are making large amounts of money through technology. Through the use of robots, companies are now able to reduce the cost of labor, which has increased their profits and indirectly has also benefited the economy. On the contrary, one can argue that not only are these robots taking over the jobs of poor people, but the robots are also robbing the people of their integrity as they no longer feel useful in the world. All three mediums have their own opinions on this subject. Kurt Vonnegut’s novel, Player Piano,
…show more content…
Even though the protagonist in Player Piano leads a revolt against the machinery, but he still believed in the evolution of robots. He believes that robot did not only take away people’s jobs,” but the sense of participation, sense of importance was taken” (Vonnegut 91). But he also believed that the “robots reduced the need of muscle, routine work and margin of error” (Vonnegut 14). It is clearly evident that in the beginning Paul’s mind was split into two about this matter and in the end who chose one side: eradication of robots. The Article also in the beginning has a mixed opinion about the topic. The article, in the beginning, talks about how robots with consciousness pose a threat to the world as they threaten “not just our jobs but perhaps humanity itself has been fueling dire warnings of future trouble ‘summoning the demon’”. But later it the writer said that talking about the future now would be absurd as “nothing man has ever created is an absolute solution but an accommodation because it will be a balancing act, and people’s comfort levels and government rules will change over time” . This shows that the writer’s opinion change over time, however, he did consider both of the outcomes. The movie considers both ideas as throughout the movie the protagonist jumps back and forth between the two ideas as
Even though the protagonist in Player Piano leads a revolt against the machinery, but he still believed in the evolution of robots. He believes that robot did not only take away people’s jobs,” but the sense of participation, sense of importance was taken” (Vonnegut 91). But he also believed that the “robots reduced the need of muscle, routine work and margin of error” (Vonnegut 14). It is clearly evident that in the beginning Paul’s mind was split into two about this matter and in the end who chose one side: eradication of robots. The Article also in the beginning has a mixed opinion about the topic. The article, in the beginning, talks about how robots with consciousness pose a threat to the world as they threaten “not just our jobs but perhaps humanity itself has been fueling dire warnings of future trouble ‘summoning the demon’”. But later it the writer said that talking about the future now would be absurd as “nothing man has ever created is an absolute solution but an accommodation because it will be a balancing act, and people’s comfort levels and government rules will change over time” . This shows that the writer’s opinion change over time, however, he did consider both of the outcomes. The movie considers both ideas as throughout the movie the protagonist jumps back and forth between the two ideas as