Preview

Pros And Cons Of Judges For Their Political Agenda And Viewpoints

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
120 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Judges For Their Political Agenda And Viewpoints
Randy,

I agree when you stated that judges have been elected for their political agenda and viewpoints. It isn't bad for a judge to have a different viewpoint than someone else. But if I were in the courtroom, I would want the judge to have the same viewpoints as I do. I also agree when you stated that no one will ever find a judge that doesn't have to fight with a little bit of influence, but it is what the judge does with his decisions. You made a good statement when you said that when voting for a judge, you have to find the right judge that is able to carry out his job without being influenced by
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

    As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral?
    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages

    To what extent are UK judges both independent and neutral?

    The independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative is said to kept by things like their fixed salaries and sub judice rule. Their salaries ‘are paid from the Consolidated Fund’ and aren’t fixed or changeable by Parliament or the government which keeps the judiciary free from political pressure in terms of finance. The sub judice rule is where the MPs in the House of Commons are unable to comment on current or pending cases. This keeps the judiciary free from political interference and prevents prejudice against judicial decisions. This rule is followed by ministers and civil servants too. Judges are said to be kept neutral because they lack politically ‘partisan activity’ as they don’t comment on ‘matters of public policy’ and avoid siding with different party governments. Another way the judiciary has been made increasingly independent and neutral is the changed position of the Lord Chancellor following the ‘2005 Constitutional Reform Act as he was previously the ‘head of the judiciary, the presiding officers of the House of Lords and a member of the Cabinet’. This Act removed his judicial role and transferred it to the Lord Chief Justice while also separating the ‘law lords’ from the House of Lords via the ‘establishment of a new Supreme Court’ in 2009. This again, separates the judiciary from the legislature and executive which enhances independence and neutrality.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Texas Judicial System Case Study
    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Texas Judicial System Case Study

    This fact is solidly undisputable because when money and political influence are used in selecting leaders of any society, then it implies that there are those who will be left out of the decision-making process because of the class they belong or social status to which they are categorized. For full inclusion of people in leadership processes, justice and truth must always prevail (Mott, 49). Therefore, concerning the case of Texas judge selection criterion, it is arguably not the best practice due to a multiplicity of reasons that have been highlighted herein. Consequently, necessary modifications need to be carried out that are in line with the suggestions of this paper for the sole rationale of achieving inclusivity, an open display of service delivery as well as transparency (Maxwell,…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection
    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    This fact in itself raises many concerns regarding our judicial process and warrants this recommendation. We know from a political phenomenon called “the axiom of eighty” that eighty percent of the voters prefer to elect judges. As well as, eighty percent of voters do not know who is running for judicial vacancies. And even more alarming is the eighty percent of adults that do not vote for judges…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Appellate Court
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Appellate Court

    An appellate court is a court that takes initial trial decisions into review upon the outcome being seen as unconstitutional by either the defendant or the government. Congressional act of 1789 Created a supreme court, appoint 6 justices and establish a lower federal court system. Various acts of congress have changed the number of seats in the supreme court over the years. the lowest amounts between 5-6 and the highest 10. In fact after the civil war the seats were fixed to nine, that's 1 chief justice and 8 associate justices of the United states of America.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Flaws In America Research Paper
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Flaws In America Research Paper

    The three branches of government provide an important system of checks and balances, but these branches are flawed. The current Congress has used it's power as the legislative branch against the executive branch, to obstruct President Barack Obama's appointment to the judicial branch, the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the POTUS and approved by Congress. Since US Supreme Court justices serve without term limits the Supreme Court can stay controlled by one political party election cycle after election cycle. The simplest solution to increase bipartisanship and improve upon representation within the US Supreme Court, with as little change as possible, is not to impose term limits for appointed justices, or to require justices to be elected by voters, but by requiring that close to half of the appointed justices be made up of members of the opposing party. This means out of the nine justices, four must be justices from the opposing…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consitutional Review

    I do believe this is true. Judicial decisions reject political motives in judicial making because the court operated on judicial impartiality and judicial independence which holds the court and judges to law without being under the influence of governmental or political agencies. Judicial independence is most important for maintain individuals rights for all citizens. The Supreme Court does not like to overturn established laws of congress but in turn will be able to overturn state rights principles.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper
    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Court Systems Paper

    The United States court system is composed of numerous sections of bodies of law that function together to ensure justness is served in fulfillment with the United States Constitution, federal, state and local laws. These organizations include law enforcement, the courts and, correction system all of which have a legitimate responsibility to maintain the American Peoples trust. I am a strong advocate for our court system, although it can use some fine-tuning every level of Justice could stand some improvement but that takes time, commitment and the right officials in office.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing

    Generally, the America public doesn't know what factors go into a judge’s decision when sentencing offenders. Keep in mind, judges have life experiences before becoming a judge such as how they were raised as an individual. Furthermore, they could have had experience with a particular crime, either a family member or someone close to them and personal feeling toward the offender. Yet, judges still have human tendencies but have to abide by some guidelines to determine their sentencing.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Judges Be Appointed
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Judges Be Appointed

    Under Article II of the Constitution, the President has the power, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint Judges of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life there for, each nomination to the Supreme Court has a long-lasting influence on the Courts decisions. Since the Supreme Court began in 1789 there have been 160 nominations for Supreme Court justices, 124 of which were approved, six of which chose not to serve. (Senate Statistics)The United State constitution has our supreme court justice nominated by the president and approved by the senate, so that the Justice isn’t pressured with facing reelection stress and political support. The System of appointing Supreme Court judges is well thought though by allowing the legislative branch check the executive branches nomination.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics