Analysis and response of “Driverless Cars: Safer Perhaps, but Professor Warns of Privacy Risks” “Driverless Cars: Safer Perhaps, but Professor Warns of Privacy Risks” by Michael McGowan, seeks to convince the reader that regulations for driverless cars should be focusing on the information they gather and who can use it. McGowan purposely uses language that can be easily understood by an audience of non-experts, while still being professional and sophisticated. He also uses terms like “gold mine” and “sleeper issue” to stimulate intrigue at the beginning to draw in readers. McGowan’s choice to quote experts in law and technology and choice to keep the article focused on facts improves his overall credibility. Throughout the article he focuses…
Early 2015, Google has gotten closer to finish their final idea. In the near future time, many cars are going able to drive on their own without human control. This reflects our present day society because many people are scared to drive like me, and it can be beneficial for blind people to use the Google car, to get to places by just using their voice rather than their eyes that they don't have. The reason the author wrote this article because she is stating that car technology has been growing, and sooner or later, other industries are going to make driverless…
In " Will your driverless car kill you so others live?" author Eric Schwitzgebel argues that driverless car may make crucial desions when in conflict, that may risk your life. He targets the audience, by putting them in this type of situation, discussing the dangers the cars would bring to its passsengers. Schwitzgebel contradicts his argument by stating that self driving car may actually be useful for young teens who can not keep their eyes on the road.…
Senior transportation editor at Business Insider, Cadie Thompson, in her article, The 3 Biggest Ways Self-Driving Cars Will Improve our Lives, published in June 2016, addresses the topic of driverless cars and argues that they will have an overall positive impact on our world. Thompson supports her claim by utilizing a lot of data and statistics to back up her statements, and also by establishing her credibility through her use of language. The author’s overall purpose is to discuss the benefits of driverless cars in order to make the audience more aware and open to this topic. Thompson employs a scientific tone in her article in order to emphasize the ideas presented.…
The claim of this passage is distracted driving is a dangerous thing, and anybody can be involved in a wreck.…
An American writer and futurist, Alvin Toffler once said, “Our technological powers increase, but the side effects and potential hazards also escalate.” What Toffler is inferring is that in this 21st Century, humans are born into a world full of wonderful gadgets. But behind all these wonderful gadgets lies some pretty scary effects to it. With the knowledge of knowing that there is a high possibility of getting into a car accident; teens nowadays, including adults, use their phones while driving. Since the roads humans drive on everyday are saturated with ignorant use of cellphones, the risk of one's life and the pedestrians life is summiting. Nowadays, humans think that they can multitask, but they are wrong. Quite a lot of deaths and road…
Bainwol argues that because these built-in systems allow the phone to connect to the system, there is no need for a driver to even have their phone anywhere in sight. He boldly states that even if it is illegal for Americans to use their phone while they drive, they are going to continue to do so. From these arguments he concludes that the best way companies will be able to reduce the traffic fatality rate is to allow Americans to continue to have technology available to them while in the car. At the same time the companies need to effectively persuade them to only use technology that is provided in the car’s system. Reynolds takes an opposite stance by saying that the risk of crashing is still going to be four times more likely if automakers allow consumers to continue to use technology like they are already doing. He parallels this issue with another issue on smoking in which adding filters to cigarettes does not make cigarette smoking safe. This example aids in solidifying his argument that “impairment is impairment”, whether a driver has access to technology through a hand-held device or a built-in…
A self-driving car can sense its environment and things around it. It also has a GPS unit in the car, the car uses the positional information from the GPS to localize itself and give a 3-D image. From the 3-D images, humans program the car to make intelligent decisions , for example using the 3-D to find an optimal path to their destination that avoids obstacles. Once the vehicle finds the best path to take, it sends a signal to the different parts of the car(steering, braking, throttle etc). According to robohub.com, the car uses model input(by the creators) to find what object is which and how to react to them. For example if the car sees a 2 wheeled object moving at 40 mph, it will know it is a motorcycle instead of a bicycle. I think…
Picture the streets completely filled with cars, not moving, going nowhere; an endless standstill of traffic. Driverless cars aren’t all they’re cracked up to be, they can and will cause problems. If driverless cars take over then laws will need to be rewritten, new possibile insurance matters occur, and traffic will increase causing longer commutes.…
Driverless cars are very efficient. When more than driverless cars on the road they use their 3D brain to signal the other cars and “will not suddenly stop, so the gaps between can be shorted” said Tony Borroz. “Intelligent roadways will allow the timing of traffic density and speed.” Some may say that cars controlled by a human is safer because they would have complete control over their own safety, but at the same time humans get into an over one million crashed a…
Autonomous cars have many applications a driver should always be capable of taking over as a safety measure. Putting too much faith into self-driving vehicles will cause people to be less alert they themselves may depend too highly on the vehicle's decision making putting themselves at risk. The authors of a Gale opposing viewpoints article made it known that “At a 2013 technology conference in Las Vegas, researchers demonstrated how the computers in driverless cars could be hacked to making them drive erratically and dangerously. “These virus’ are capable of taking over a car's control system wreaking havoc on the road at any moment. As stated by Zeller “the virus’ supposedly enter the cars over the Bluetooth wireless link that lets drivers use their cellphones to carry on hands-free conversations through the cars' microphones and speakers.” These new devices are flawed misleading car buyers into seeing these system as an improvement reducing the risk while at the same time providing a path to put yourselves in harm’s…
In the article “PRO/CON: Cars that drive themselves could soon become the norm” by Newsela staff it states that “They also have problems figuring out when objects such as bits of paper garbage are harmless, so they may swerve for no reason.” This evidence illustrates that driverless cars isn’t such a good idea because it can cause accidents and cause people to get hurt.…
Driverless cars are stupid. One of the reasons i'm against driverless cars is because i want to be able to drive my car and not be lazy. Another reason is that what if the car stops working and the brakes dont work and the car keeps going and crashes.…
Self-driving cars would elevate the already serious effects of terrorists. Driverless cars would make it possible for the car to be loaded with explosives and used as a moving bomb or to automatically drive and cause a serious crash because they could be hacked and are not human controlled (Goodman). Safety is always a major concern with cars, whether they are driverless or not. Driverless cars would not be efficient because they could do more harm than help.…
To conclude, the use of technology is a great threat while driving since the amount of fatalities is…