Preview

Teaching Creationism in Schools

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teaching Creationism in Schools
Teaching Creationism in Schools

The issue of teaching creationism in the public schools has long been debated. Over the years many different arguments have been made. First creationists tried to have the teaching of evolution outlawed. This issue went to the Supreme Court in 1968, where in _Epperson v. Arkansas_ the high court ruled against banning the teaching of evolution. Soon after this decision creationists began to call for 'equal time ', or the equal treatment of creation theory and evolution theory. When this attempt also failed creationists turned to 'creation science ' (Grunes 465). Today the major argument for the teaching of creationism in public schools is that creationism is a scientific theory and thus should be taught alongside evolution. The combatants against creationism being taught in public schools are those who believe creation science is bad science and those who believe it violates the separation of church and state. Supporters of creation science are organizations that are collectively referred to as the New Christian Right, such as the Institute for Creation Research. On the other hand, those who oppose creation science are usually scientists, educators, and civil liberties organizations (Grunes 466).

The majority of those people who desire for creationism to be taught in the public schools cite that it is scientific. They push for the teaching of creation science which is defined as "scientific evidence for creation and the inferences from that evidence" (Tatina 275). The inferences from that evidence are "sudden creation of the universe from nothing, recent formulation of the earth, creation of man and other biological kinds, a worldwide flood", and "the insufficiency of mutation and natural selection in bringing about development of living kinds from a single organism" (Grunes 470). These creation scientists, as they are called, want the teaching of the two scientific theories, evolution and creation science, to be taught side



Cited: Creation- Life Publishers, 1978. Ruse, Michael, ed Prometheus Books, 1988. Scott, Eugenie C 103.7 (July 1994):10-13. Tatina, Robert Teaching of Evolution & Creationism." _The American Biology Teacher_ 51.5 (May 1989):2750.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This sparked a mass of controversy. The proposal from Buckingham raised an eyebrow to whether intelligent design should be taught in science classrooms as an alternative to evolution. Personally, I believe intelligent design can be mentioned in the classroom in a comparative sense, but the approach and delivery is what is significant. In the science classroom, it is important for students to learn about Darwin and the theory of evolution, but nothing should be introduced in a persuasive or derogatory manner because the school is meant to educate and not…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eventually schools would start to teach the theory of evolution which indicates the abolishment of the Butler Act (which was officially eliminated in the late 1960s.) It became quite clear that teaching science…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Experiences, circumstances and values shape the way we think, and give us a foundation for what will become our “worldview.” In order to make a decision on what these beliefs are, we can make judgments based on both faith and scientific knowledge. The origin of Progressive Creationism brings lessons from the Bible into balance with evidence from contemporary science. Progressive Creationism makes room for explanations to scientific findings by interpreting a much longer time frame for creation, but it does not negate an God as being present at every stage, and responsible for the miracles of the creation of life. Influences that have led me to consider this position come from family, church, science classes, and my own personal interpretation…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    “There are none who are as deaf as those who do not want to hear,” Barry Leventhal once said this quote (Geisler and Turek). There are so many different creation theories that people have been talking about them for centuries, none have been one hundred percent proven but all are debatable. The problem with most professionals who study creation theories is they are very stubborn. Once somebody has a plausible theory in their head they do not listen to any other theories. This quote by Barry Leventhal perfectly describes this characteristic of the professionals mentioned earlier. They are “deaf” because they refused to hear what others had to say. Many documents were written by these “deaf” professionals about their adopted theory; they…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kitzmiller Study

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case of Kitzmiller versus Dover Area School District, the plaintiff Kitzmiller argued that the defendant, Dover Area School District, changed the curriculum of a biology course on the theory of evolution to intelligent design, which is a form of creationism. The defendants tried to deny that Intelligent Design a form of creationism but a form of true science. On the topic of scientific world view, further examination will take place on how science is democratic, how illegitimate forms of argumentation take place in this case and how intelligent design is a pseudoscience.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Given the many battlefields that exist in America’s Culture War on public education, the main focus will be on the contemporary battlefront in the debate to include Intelligent Design in the public schools’ science curriculum. From the vast amounts of information that exists on this topic alone, it is important to define ID, identify the polar opponents, and understand a brief view of their core issues.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    A seemingly endless debate continues over the legitimacy of teaching evolutionary theory in classrooms, particularly in communities where religion plays a prominent role in community life. Some church leaders, teachers and school board members argue that alternate explanations provided by creationists or proponents of intelligent design should be taught alongside those of evolutionary theorists in science classrooms. People who are proponents of evolutionary theory are quick to offer a retort, usually suggesting that evolution is a proven fact; while denouncing the two aforementioned opposing views as belief systems which cannot be subjected to scientific analysis. Therefore, they suggest, such views are not appropriate subjects for science classrooms.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Magner, L (2001). Evolution and Creationism in American Public Schools. Science and Its Time, Retrieved March 24, 2008, from http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itweb/omah25471…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment prohibits Congress from casual any laws that appearance favor to any accurate adoration that, in effect, is an adequately absolute break of the abbey and state. If Congress were to pass a law that the Christian adaptation of creationism be taught, even in abstract classes in accessible schools which are accurate by the taxes of all Americans, it would breach the built-in rights of Hindus, Moslems, Buddhist, and array of added religions that curl beyond the country, abounding of which accept their own belief of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Today’s society there are many things that parents would like to control for the well being of their child while he or she is growing up. An example of that is when you see a parent deny their kids of listen to a certain kind of music or watching a certain show. Every parent has their own idea of how they believe that there child should be raised. The same concept applies when it comes to teaching. Adults want to filter what is being taught which leads to the argument of creation vs. evolution in schools. Some adults think it is blasphemous to teach evolution and vise versa with creation in the class room. This is an issue that has raged on for years and will be explored starting with the teachings of evolution.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, religion and science have been in constant clashes, and one of the most recent clashes is whether if creationism and/or intelligent design should be taught in public schools.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Young Earth

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many scientists and creationist are Bible believing Christian like Isaac Newton, Edward Blyth, Kurt Wise, and Inn Taylor who is the president of creation research Family Radio, Oakland, CA and host of others who believe in a literal Genesis as the word of God which is accurate and without any error, also agreed with Genesis that God created the heaven and the earth in 6 days, 24 hours and no other wise like millions or billions as evolutionist perceived. The Bible is the truth word of God. “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” 2 The web site www.answersingenesis.org explained many questions and misconception that one may have about Genesis…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though some states do teach both and very few teach how evolution is wrong, the majority of public school students in the US are taught evolution. Creation is a belief and evolution is a scientific theory. Different published works will say contrasting things about this controversy and how well, scientifically speaking the two sides stack against each other. Neither creation nor evolution can be proven using the scientific method because they can’t be tested. All that is left to do is take the evidence left by both sides and compare them to how well they fit into the science and history of the…

    • 3363 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution which states that mankind has descended from a lower order of animals (Censorship in Schools, IV, 4), contradicts with the basis of our government. The United States government is based on the bible. Therefore, if you take into consideration this idea that the U.S. government is based on the bible, teaching evolution to our students undermines the foundation of our government. However, Charles Darwin only crated a theory. We encourage our students to think outside the box. Creative thinking is a key process in developing any new idea. It is contradictory to refuse to teach a theory about evolution, while also encouraging student to come up with new theories of their own. The case of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes where Scopes was arrested for teaching evolution in Dayton, Tennessee 1925 is the most studied case when it comes to the teaching of evolution. (Herndon 8). John Scopes was arrested for teaching Darwin’s Theory of evolution, which was against Tennessee law at the time. There are many opinions as to whether the case was a victory for either side, but the fact of the matter is that the information was now out and being talked about. A more recent case is McClean v. Arkansas which made it clear that in Arkansas, “Balanced Treatment” is to be used when teaching either evolutionary science or creation science. (Herndon 9). That is that if a teacher decides to teach either evolutionary or…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays