Preview

What Is The Process Of The Ratification Of Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Process Of The Ratification Of Constitution
The ratification process began when the Congress turned the Constitution over the state legislature for the consideration through specially elected state conventions of the people. The Ratification of Constitution began on June 21st, 1788. This is the finalization of the drafting process of the Constitution of the United States. Which later was finalized on September 17th, 1787. The process of the Ratification of Constitution was ambiguous in procedure because of its statues expressed in the Article of Confederation. A dispute existing between the old legislation and the new legislation added the difficulty to the process. The most serious criticism was that the Constitutional Convention had failed to adopt the Bill of Rights promoted by George …show more content…
The founders of the Federalists began rapidly secured 5 of the 9 states. Four states would be ratified later were Virginia, New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island. Also, the ratification process was not easy at all. The process Pennsylvania was almost corrupt. The Pennsylvania State Assembly was coming to an end and begun to have a special convention of the Constitution before the Congress forwarded the states. The Antifederalist in the state assembly tried to block the move by refusing to attend the ratification process, since without them, there were not enough to ratify. In the end, Antifederalist were dragged through the street of Philadelphia and seated in the Pennsylvania State House. Besides, the ratification in New York was not easy, either. The process in New York appeared to be controlled by the Antifederalist power under George Clinton that were opposed to the ratification of the Constitution. In the meantime, the Federalist, Alexander Hamilton display a masterful political skill to overcome a two-to-one by the Antifederalists, and the final vote was support the approval in the New York convention. This triumph was also the inspiration in Virginia as well, where the side of Antifederalists was taken up by Patrick Henry and the Federalist side by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At Philadelphia in 1778, John Dickinson drafted the first constitution for the United States as a nation. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in 1777 and submitted to the states for ratification. When Virginia and New York agreed to give up their claims to western lands, the Articles of Confederation were finally ratified in March 1781. The Articles established a central government that consisted of just one body, a congress. In this unicameral nation, the power given to states had greater power than the Federal power. Under the Articles of Confederation America was a weak nation without unity, which caused many problems to arise.…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a definite divide between supporters and opponents. The opponents did not reject the Articles. Many opponents feared that the Constitution is undemocratic and that it could be very oppressive overall. There were controversies about the Constitution and how it failed to address…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787 by delegates who went to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. The convention was supervised by George Washington. It established fundamental laws, America’s national government and the basic rights for American citizens. In America’s first government document which was the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back to the opposing view of the ratification of the Constitution is Document five. Document five talks about the types of people that are trying to get into congress, and may be in congress fool the citizens with their nice and smart voices as well as their money; when really they only discuss the tip of the matter with you. And aren’t doing as much as they could be doing. The document also talks about that theses people who have the money are able to use that money to travel to Philadelphia and have an impact on congress, and their…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. constitution was made it there was a long debate over the ratification of the constitution. There were two sides in the debate, the Federalists, who were supporter of the new constitution, and were better, organized than their opponents, and the Federalists had the support of the most respected men in America, George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin. The other side of the debate was the Antifederalists, who opposed ratification; although they weren’t as organized as the Federalists they did have some dedicated supporters. One major argument used by the supporters’ side in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. constitution is that there would be disorder without a strong central government.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is know as the Philadelphia Convention, in which Federalist and Antifederalist debated the laws that were to be written in the constitution. The arguments at this convention, proved just how divided the states were. For instance, Mr. Sherman from Connecticut, argued that the House of Representatives should not be elected by the people, but instead they should be elevated by the state's legislature, since he believed many citizens were uneducated. But, Mr. Mason from Virginia argued that instead of the legislature, the democratic principle was to allow an election of branch by the people, agreeing with Mr. Wilson, from Pennsylvania's statement that, “No government could long subsist without the confidence of the people.” (The Confederation and the Constitution, 166). Many states alongside Connecticut agreed that citizens shouldn’t have the right to appoint people into the House of Representatives, but American citizens who are registered voters have the right to vote for their…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787 after several failed attempts of creating a set of laws that was to replace the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation needed to be replaced because it caused many issues between the states and the federal government. The states had too much independence, while the federal government had little power over them. In 1789, delegates from each state, excluding Rhode Island, met in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to create the new Constitution. Their plan was to create a government with increased federal authority that also protected the basic rights of American citizens.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the Constitution was written and submitted to the states for ratification, this leading to months of fierce debate. Some states welcomed the new Constitution but others were fearful of it. They were afraid that this would be just like being under the control of Great Britain, which they just broke free from. But the rest of the states saw this as a good thing and very necessary for America to strive.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Revolution of 1776, America had to transition itself from thirteen disjointed colonies to one unified nation. In 1777, the Articles of Confederation was drafted and submitted for the states’ approval. Out of thirteen states, only eight ratified the plan for a national government by 1778, while nearly three more years passed before the last state approved the Articles (Soomo Publications, 2015). Although the Articles of Confederation provided a system for the Continental Congress to direct the Revolutionary War, Congress felt the need for a stronger union with enough power to defeat Great Britain. The belief that a constitutional order must be fitting to its republican character was met with the fear of a central authority (HistoryEd, 2009). Such a fear may have potentially devastated the ability to adequately serve a considerable union like the United States. In response to this fear, Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton published essays in hopes of swaying the public opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution. The Federalist Papers are a collection of eighty-five articles written by Hamilton, as well as James Madison and John Jay, promoted ratifying the Constitution in hopes of creating a resilient, centralized government (Lutz, 1990). After months of deliberation at the Constitutional Convention in Pennsylvania, a Constitution was ratified and agreed upon by the states.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forming this new country was a tough process. There were several different ideas. After realizing that the country was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came a new idea; which was to ratify the Constitution. The procedures for ratifying the new Constitution were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The supporters major argument was that America has many problems and the only way to fix these problems is to ratify the Constitution, whereas the opponents major argument was that the new Constitution had too much major change and did not protect America’s citizens. The supporters mostly felt as though the current Constitution has many problems and common men across the United States struggle and complain because of the current Constitution. The supporters also felt that the current Constitution was made too much by people who did not know how to run a…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 it was required that nine of the thirteen states would need to ratify it before it became valid. As the debate over the Constitution continued, two opposing sides materialized: the Federalists and the AntiFederalists.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles was an agreement that took place among the first 13 states in the United States, which served as the country’s first constitution. The document was initially drafted by a committee that as appointed by the continental congress on July 1776 (Schultz 112). By November 1777, a clear draft was sent out to all the thirteen states for their approval and for implementation. However, ratifications took place in March 1781, after all thirteen states approved of…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution is once created in 1787 is now still used by the country of The United States of America today. Now a great accomplishment, it took a little more than just one draft to be able to ratify it. The states that didn’t ratify the constitution at first definitely choice right compared to the states that agreed first. The states that didn’t ratify in the beginning chose wisely for with first ratifying there would not have been things such as. The reason is if they would have immediately agreed on the first draft of the constitution there would not have been any base rights that the citizens would have. 1“...the document lacked a legitimate Bill of Rights which would protect the rights of States and…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays