Preview

dred scott case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1909 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
dred scott case
On June 19th 1862 the US Congress prohibits slavery in the United States territories nullifying the Dred Scott

Case. This was the most important day in US history for African Americans. This is because it helped blacks gain

the rights they deserve. It also gave them rights they never thought they could achieve. This Court case of Scott

vs. Sanford was a catalyst to riots, other court cases such as Brown vs. Board of Education, Rachel vs. Walker and

many acts and amendments resulted from one mans wish to be free. Dred Scott was a slave to the Emerson

family of Missouri. Emerson soon died in 1846 making Scott sue for his freedom. He soon lost the case in a state

court, but shortly after he was introduced to a national court. Scott Soon after lost the case again but then was

later considered free man. This case caused many good things to occur, and many things bad to occur. Some of

these things include the strengthening of the Republican Party in opposition to the courts decision; and it increased

the abolitionist to get rid of slavery which eventually leads to the civil war. There are also some negatives to the

Dred Scott Case like how it eventually led to the Panic of 1857. As well caused fights like Bleeding Kansas.

Even the system of checks and balances was hurt by the Dred Scott Case. This case played a major role in how

African Americans live today and how they are accepted among people. Without the efforts of Dred Scott and the

people who followed in his footsteps there would be no way African Americans can live with the freedom and

rights they have today because of the Dred Scott Case. Scott in addition caused people to really understand what

life was like back then and how he stood up for what he thought was right. With the help of others Scott was able

to obtain his freedom and in the process of that he managed to cause an epidemic of black movements and other

people to do what they thought

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    These are the rights that all individuals born into the United States of America are naturally given, or the naturalized have. These rights include life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, to share values of equality, freedom and justice. These are the rights that are unalienable and they are explained in the social contract that the government should protect these rights. The King violated this.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney stated that Dred Scott had no right to bring a law suit in Federal Court, because the Constitution only afforded that right to U.S. citizens. Since Scott was a slave, he was not a citizen. He went…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a African American slave born in Virginia in the year 1800. In the 1830s Scott and Harriet Robinson lived in Fort Snelling in the 1830s working as free people as slavery was outlawed in the area. He lived there with an army surgeon named Emerson and was paid an independent salary. When Emerson was reassigned to the south they Scotts moved to fort Jesup in Louisiana. But soon returned to Fort snelling. In 1846 the Scotts decided to sue for their freedom because they were denied the optioned to buy it by Emerson's widow. In 1853 they filed in federal court. After Dred was freed in St. Louis circuit court in 1857, the supreme court made a decision based on the Dred Scott case stating that African Americans were not citizens and…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)- It showed that black american weren’t able to sue in court.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were two people who were very helpful to Dred gaining his freedom. One was Taylor Blow-who backed him up during his case, she would also be the one to set him free. Another person is Calvin Chaffee-he was an abolitionist. Chaffee would also be the one who gives Taylor Blow ownership of Dred Scott. “Chaffee made a deal with his wife to transfer ownership of the Scott family to one of the Blow children, Taylor Blow” in St.Louis under Missouri law, a slave owner could set his or her slave free if he /she wishes to, and “Taylor Blow did just that for the Scott family”(Gale Encyclopedia of U.S. History…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being born into slavery meant that Scott could be passed around from owner to owner. His first owner, Peter Blow, treated him fairly and took him along as his family relocated from Virginia, to Alabama, and then Missouri. After Peter Blow’s death, Scott was sold to John Emerson, a US Army doctor. After serving the Emerson’s for a few years, Dr. Emerson gave Scott to his wife’s brother, John Sanford. Scott tried to buy his freedom away from Dr. Emerson’s wife but she would not accept that. Since Scott had spent time living in Illinois, a free state, he pursued his right to sue Sanford for his freedom. Scott was assisted at the time by a group of antislavery lawyers.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The process began in 1846: Scott lost in his initial suit in a local St. Louis district court, but he won in a second trial, only to have that decision overturned by the Missouri State Supreme Court. With support from local abolitionists, Scott filed another suit in federal court in 1854, against John Sanford, the widow Emerson's brother and executor of his estate. When that case was decided in favor of Sanford, that Scott turned to the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Revisiting Dred Scott: Prudence, Providence, and the Limits of Constitutional Statesmanship, Justin Buckley Dyer argues “According to the opinion written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, African slaves and their descendants were not, and could never become, citizens of the United States,”1 rejecting that President Abraham Lincoln meant any less, when he “declared Taney’s opinion to be ‘erroneous”2 could endure modern scrutiny. During the framing and development of the early American United States, slavery and its transition into legalized freedom constantly challenged its opponents…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Dred Scott case was a landmark case that sparked uproar from state officials after Chief Justice Taney gave the majority opinion of the court. Dred Scott was a slave owned by an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, with whom Scott traveled to the free state of Illinois. Following a two and a half year stay in Illinois, Scott and his master moved to Wisconsin, also a free state. However, Scott’s extended stay in Illinois gave him the power to make a legal standing to request his freedom, however Scott never followed through possibly due to his ignorance of the statute. After Emerson’s death, Scott was hired out to an army captain, which then prompted Scott to request his freedom. In June of 1847, Dred Scott went to trial in order to legally win…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    slavery as evil, it is also true that he shared the belief that blacks could not be integrated into…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays