Preview

In Defense of Food

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In Defense of Food
ENGWR 301
13 February 2014
In Defense of Pollan When Michael Pollan's book The Omnivore's Dilemma was published, many readers began questioning him for advice on what they should eat in order to stay healthy. In his more recent book, In Defense of Food, he responds with three rules, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants"(Pollan 1). This seven word response seems too simple for a relatively complicated question, but as he further elaborates these rules into specific guidelines, this summary turns out to be surprisingly complete. Using inductive and deductive reasoning, he debunks the ideas behind nutritionism and food science, and proves that the western diet is the cause for food related diseases. Inductive reasoning is when a general conclusion is drawn based off observations, and deductive reasoning is when specific conclusion is drawn based on general concepts (Griffith 269-270). In Michael Pollan's book, In Defense of Food, his reasoning is sound because he makes strong inductive and deductive arguments which are supported by studies and research from credible sources. In the first section of Pollan's book, he explains what nutritionism is and how it has led to bad food science. Nutritionism is the "widely shared but unexamined assumption that the key to understanding food is indeed the nutrient. To put in another way: Foods are essentially the sum of their nutrients"(Pollan 28). According to nutritionism, since nutrients are invisible and a mystery to us, we rely on scientists to explain the unseen reality of food for us, and look toward them for expert help. But Pollan asks, why do we need help? Throughout human history, Pollan explains that before nutritionism was invented, "to guide us we had, instead, Culture, which, at least when it comes to food, is really just a fancy word for mother"(Pollan 3). As he further elaborates on this, he explains how nutritionism has successfully replaced culture as a guideline for what to eat. "Over the last



Cited: Griffith, Kelley. Writing Essays about Literature: A Guide and Style Sheet. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 2014. 269-270 Print. Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater 's Manifesto. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Michael Pollan’s purpose for writing this book was to inform the reader of the Omnivore’s Dilemma, the secrets behind what we eat. As omnivores, we humans have the a dilemma about our food, where it comes and what it comes from. Pollan informs the reader this because many people in America and around the world do not know where our food that we ingest comes from. After Pollan discovers himself the lies and truths of what actually happens through the process of our food, he shares the knowledge and information to many more in this memorable book. “I had to go back to the beginning, to the farms and fields where our food is grown. Then I followed it each step of the way, and watched what happened to our food on its way stomachs”(1.4) In chapter…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A number seven, no pickles, with a large sprite please. Oh, can we have some extra ketchup with that as well?” This answer may resemble something near how most people would respond to Pollans question, “What should we have for dinner?” posed at the beginning of his book, The Omnivores Dilemma. Pollan breaks his book down into three major components, the preface, the process, and the person. By clearly identifying what he is examining, and through firsthand experience, Pollan was able to discuss American diet, and all that goes along with it.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eating has profoundly impact and influence on individual life. We can tell where most people are going to end up in life simply based on the choice they made on food. Michael Pollen discusses in his article " The Omnivore’s Dilemma" a true understanding of what we eat and what we should eat. Pollan points out that alternative method of producing food that is being overshadowed by the big, industrial system we have in place to provide consumers with sustenance.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the introduction, Pollan brings up a very good point about Americans and their views on dieting and eating “healthier”. Pollan explains the way that Americans went through a so-called “carbophobia” period in 2002, and how, unfortunately, this seems to remain true even today. The foods that American’s tend stay away from because of scientists and nutritionists devaluing…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In almost every culture, one of the most cherished pass times is food. We eat to sustain or health, to celebrate, to morn, and sometimes just to do it. Yet, how often do we question were that food comes from? Most everyone purchases their meals from the grocery store or at a restaurant but have you ever wondered where that juicy steak grazed? How about how those crisp vegetables? Where were those grown? The Omnivore 's Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, analyzes the eating habits and food chains of modern America in an attempt to bring readers closer to the origin of their foods. Not only where it comes from, but where it all begins, as well as what it takes to keep all of those plants and animals in production. In part two of the Omnivore’s Dilemma: Pastoral: Grass, Pollan gives background on what all produce and livestock need to be the best it can be. As simple as it may sound, it starts with the grass. Yet, Pollan makes it very clear it’s not always as simple as it sounds. After starting The Omnivore’s Dilemma I had a few expectations. Firstly, I enjoy a blend of humor and philosophy; I want what I read to make me think, for the words to flow nicely from one completely thought to the next, and for the overall of the chapters to hold my attention.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan reading the article “Food as Thought” will respond as a scientific theory on health…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Chapter 1 of “In Defense of Food” the author, Michael Pollan, refers to what we humans should eat in order to be maximally healthy. First, Liebig the father of modern nutritional sciencea German chemist that proposes a theory of metabolism, explained life strictly in terms of chemical nutrients such as vitalism. Consequently, Pollan concocted the first baby formula based in vitamins, essential fats and amino acids; as a result, in January 1977, the committee and the Senator George McGovern, established a set of dietary guidelines pretending to reduce all kind of diseases like, cancer, heart disease, obesity and diabetes, just cutting down the consumption of red meat and dairy products, but at the same time they was sending warnings to…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nutritionism is the idea that the nutritional value of a food is the sum of all its individual nutrients, vitamins and other components. This is also known as scientific reductionism, when nutritionists and food scientists began to isolate the health components of food rather than the whole food product. Therefore, the food is divided into invisible nutrients and each nutrient within the food is divided into the healthy and unhealthy ones. Since nutrients are invisible, it is now necessary to rely on nutrition experts to make food choices for us and tell us which nutrients are healthy or unhealthy. Moreover, it also means that the only point of eating is to promote bodily health, which nutrients are “good” for health and which ones are “bad”.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book I chose to read for my summer homework was In Defense of Food by Michael Pollan. Pollan has written many books regarding what to eat and how the foods we consume affect us. In this book, he opens with simple advice, “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly Plants” (Pollan 1). As straightforward as it sounds, Pollan quickly demonstrates how complicated this can be. Food is all around us. However, there are whole foods, stuff you’d find at a farmer’s market, and then there are the foods that line up the walls of our supermarkets, highly processed snacks and “foods” that contain a mirade of unpronounceable ingredients. Many of these foods processed foods, especially those that make health claims such as “low-fat”, “lowers…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How might we plot our escape from the nutritionist and, in turn, from the most harmful effects of the Western diet? To Denis Burkitt, the English doctor stationed in Africa during World War II who gave the Western diseases their name, the answer seemed straightforward, if daunting. “The only way we’re going to reduce disease,” he said, “is to go backwards on diet and lifestyle of our ancestors.”” (423) Which sums up fairly well that this point is that the problem is more about our current social structure when it comes to food. “For most people for most of history, gathering and preparing food has been an occupation at the very heart of daily life.”…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In Defense of Food” is a book written by Michael Pollan which was released in 2008. Pollan writes about the “Western Diet” and the dangers associated with it. He proposes a new answer to what we should and should not eat. He states that it comes down to seven simple words: Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants. Those are the words that he opens the book with, this is his basic recommendation. He states that the rest of the book is just a detailed elaboration of those words. The first half of the book is all about criticizing and deconstructing the “health disaster”, as Pollan calls it, of the “western diet”, as well as the philosophy of nurtitionism that surrounds it. The second half of the book focuses on solutions to this disaster and Pollan’s thoughts on the matter.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan’s work in “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” does not resonate practically anything in my life. I buy food from the grocery store and cook it at home or I will go out to dinner. Its when I go out to dinner that I run into problems with the choice of food that I want to eat. While in the section, Personal, the only problem with the food choice is if it is poisonous or not.Those possibilities, I usually never encounter, unlike Pollan, who had to deal with it in the…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Pollan believes that people should have knowledge of foods from the ancient past. This valuable wisdom has been collected over thousands of years and can be used to improve present day diets. He states, “Modern Americans have lost the solution to the omnivore’s dilemma and today the problem is bigger than it has ever been. But it’s not an unsolvable problem. We need to recover the skills and knowledge people used to have” (104). Michael Pollan explains how learning about the history of food will result in food choices (such as eating locally-grown foods) which are safe and healthy.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I myself tend to be keen to understand how the world around me functions. I am passionate about all knowledge regardless of topic and prior to reading Pollan’s piece, I had a firm understanding of what we ate and how it was linked economically to major corporations. Cutting down on costs was and always will be every food company’s number one priority.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan explains that scientific theories of nutritionism focus on individual nutrients rather than foods as a whole (Pollan, 434). He further goes on to refute this claim mentioning that these scientific theories contradict with one another. Pollan explains “the scientists who blame our health problems on deficiencies of [micronutrients] are not the same scientists who see a sugar soaked diet leading to metabolic syndrome and from there to diabetes, heart disease…”(Pollan, 435). On one hand there are scientists who blame health problems on a lack of nutrients, and on the other hand there are scientists who blame those health problems on a sugar soaked diet. By stating these theories, Pollan tries to get his point across that they all have the same thing in common; these theories are mere explanations to western diseases. In Pollan’s view, “scientists can argue all they want about the mechanisms behind this phenomenon, but whichever it is, the solution would appear to remain very much the same: Stop eating a Western diet” (Pollan, 435). In other words, no matter what reason scientists have for the causes of western…

    • 743 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays