Preview

Ldr 531 Situational Leadership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
804 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ldr 531 Situational Leadership
Situational Leadership
Research on leadership is a subject that has been approached in many different ways. Theories on leadership can be classified according to the type of variable that is emphasized the most. Three types of variables relevant to these theories include (1) characteristics of leaders, (2) characteristics of followers, and (3) characteristics of the situation (Yuri, G., 2010). In the textbook Leadership in Organizations, Yuri, G. classifies these theories into the following five approaches: (1) the trait approach, (2) the behavior approach, (3) the power-influence approach, (4) the situational approach, and (5) the integrative approach. This paper briefly discusses the situational approach of studying leadership.
Method Description Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) evolved from the Life Cycle of Leadership Theory developed by Hersey and Blanchard (1969). Hersey and Blanchard’s theory has four major situational variables: (1) task behavior, (2) relationship behavior, (3) follower (or subordinate) maturity, and (4) effectiveness (Johansen, B. P., 1990).
Task behavior refers to the extent leaders are likely to organize and explain what activities each of the subordinates is to perform and when, where, and how tasks are to be accomplished (Johansen, B. P., 1990). Relationship behavior is defined as the extent to which leaders are likely to maintain personal relationships between themselves and members of their team and provide socio-emotional support, psychological "strokes," and facilitating behavior (Johansen, B. P., 1990). Maturity is defined as "the willingness and ability of people to take responsibility for directing their own behavior . . . considered only in relation to a specific task to be performed” (Hersey and Blachard, 1982, p. 151). Effectiveness refers to the use of effective leadership behavior which is appropriate to the situation. Effectiveness is a continuum; thus leadership behaviors are more or less effective



References: Yuki, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Johansen, B. P. (1990, Spring). Situational Leadership: A Review of the Research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1(1), 73-85. Hersey, P., & Blachard, K. (1982). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hersey, P., & Blachard, K. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Graedd, C. L. (1997, Summer). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 153-170.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    There are multiple theories of leadership which must be actively used to be a successful leader. The situational theory projects that the situation within the work place and how the leader reacts to it are the most significant elements in exceptional leadership. The situation comprises of the trust and respect that the workers obligate towards their superior, and how much control the leader has over the reward given for good work by his subordinates. This also links in with fieder’s contingency model on how leadership affects the organizational situation. (Daft, R. (1999). Research Persepctives on Indivdual Leadership. In: - Leadership: Theory and Management. Olrando: The Dryden Press. 94-95). An example of how Enron Leaders failed in applying the situational theory was the way in which they would fire…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, situational leadership is a contingency model that focuses on the followers. The model suggests that successful leadership is accomplished by selecting the right leadership style, based on the level of followers readiness. Emphasis on the followers in leadership effectiveness reflects the reality that it is the followers who accept or reject the leader. Regardless of what the leader does, effectiveness depends on the actions of his or her followers. Fred Fiedler, developed the Leadership Contingency Model; and, I think that situational leadership uses the same two leadership dimensions that Fiedler identified: task and relationship behaviors. However, Hersey and Blanchard delved a step further by considering each as either high or low; and also, combining them into four specific leader behaviors: telling (high task-low relationship). The leader defines roles and tells people what, how, when, and where to do various tasks. It emphasizes directive behavior; selling (high task-high relationship). The leader provides both directive behavior and supportive behavior; participating (high relationship-low task). The leader and follower share in decision making, with the main role of the leader being facilitating and communicating; and also, delegating (low relationship-low task). The leader provides little direction or support.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One weakness of the situational approach is that there are a limited number of research studies that have been done and there are not many published research findings. In addition, this approach does not take into account the commitment and competence level of managers. If the manager is not committed and does not have a strong competence level then this approach is ambiguous. Another characteristic that the situational leadership fails to take into account are demographics. Preferences among employees varied considering their age, sex, education and amount of work experience. All of the demographics indicated differences in opinion related to leadership. Finally, questionnaires that accompany…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Carrington, Keith. Leadership page. (2007). [Graphic illustration of Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model 2008] Retrieved from http://www.keithcarrington.com/leadership.html…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most popular and extensively researched situational theory of leadership was first proposed by Fred Piedler during the 1960s. Fiedler's model claims that group performance depends on the interaction of the leader style and the favorableness of the situation. Fiedlers major contributions consist of(l) iden-tifying the leadership orientation of the leader and developing a way to measure it, and (2) identifying three situational factors influencing leadership and developing a method of measuring them…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leading with Visions

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing human resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situational leadership has very little in common with the other models mentioned herein. This model revolves around the leader changing leadership behaviors to meet the needs in relationship to the follower (Kouzes, 2003, p. 111). The difference between situational leadership and charismatic, servant, and transformational leadership is the lack of an organizational vision and the empowerment of the followers. Situational leadership uses followers based on their readiness level that relate to their ability and willingness to complete the task (Wren, 1995, p. 208). This aspect coupled with the leader’s task and relationship behavior is used in relation to the follower’s readiness level (Wren, 1995, p. 209).…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    •Hersey and Blanchard 's Situational Leadership, viewed 27 March 2009, •Norris, W. R., & Vecchio, R. P., 1992, Situational leadership theory. Group & Organization Management, 17(3), 331.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CONTINGENCY THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP  WHAT ARE CONTINGENCY THEORIES? _best way to organize a corporation _their performances depend on internal and external situation _leaders’ styles are classified base on these theories HOW MANY CONTINGENCY THEORIES DO WE HAVE?  FIEDLER MODEL…

    • 277 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul heresy and ken Blanchard have developed a leadership theory that has gained a strong following among management development specialists. This model called situational leadership theory. It is a contingency theory that focuses on followers' readiness/development level of follower and leader behavior/leadership styles, it created by Hersey and Blanchard (see Exhibits 1.1 or 1.2). These two approaches concern for production and concern for people, together show that there is no best style of leadership.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situational Leadership

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Dems, Kristina (2010). A Look at the Situational Leadership Model. Retrieved from Bright hub website: http://www.brighthub.com/office/home/articles/83323.aspx…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vecchio, R. and Fernandez, C. 1997. Situational Leadership theory revisited: A test of an across job perspective. The Leadership Quarterly…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marketing Strategy

    • 2894 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Blank W, W. J. (1990). A Test Of The Situational Leadership Theory. Personal Psychology, 579-597.…

    • 2894 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You 've heard the expression "He/She is a born leader." Are all leaders born? Or can leadership be learned?…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Personality Psychology is a section in psychology that is studying personality and the various individual processes. Modern psychology doesn’t really have universally accepted definition of personality. The reason for this is lies in the complexity and diversity of the phenomenon of personality. However here are some examples of the definition: according to Geddes (1911) “in ancient Rome, the word "persona" originally referred to the masks worn by actors on stage. The various masks represented the various "personae" in the stage play” the other definition was given by Krauskopf and Saunders (1994) “personality is a dynamic and organized set of characteristics possessed by a person that uniquely influences his or her cognitions, motivations, and behaviors in various situations”.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays