Later in after the story from lines 85 to the end, the woman never takes Roger to jail or even apply that thought to his head. This also proved that she didn't force a blame physically nor intentionally to the boy, supporting the claim. There are many more evidences from the book to prove reasonings, but one last confirmation found in the “Thank you, M’am” book is on lines 141-143. It distinctly expresses, telling: The woman did not ask the boy anything about where he lived, or his folks, or anything else that would embarrass him. This sentence shows that Mrs. Jones did not attempt to embarrass or blame Roger. Rather, she talks about her job and offers him food. Talking about her lifestyle and job showed how much trust she had through Roger and how personal she was among him, compared to being suspicious and pointing the finger at the boy. This defines the connection between the woman and Roger, and how she meant to help and never to embarrass or question him in wrong ways. All these reasons support the claim of Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones intending to assist Roger, instead of accusing the boy. Using three pieces of evidence attached with strong reasoning, this interpretation is valid and is proven as
Later in after the story from lines 85 to the end, the woman never takes Roger to jail or even apply that thought to his head. This also proved that she didn't force a blame physically nor intentionally to the boy, supporting the claim. There are many more evidences from the book to prove reasonings, but one last confirmation found in the “Thank you, M’am” book is on lines 141-143. It distinctly expresses, telling: The woman did not ask the boy anything about where he lived, or his folks, or anything else that would embarrass him. This sentence shows that Mrs. Jones did not attempt to embarrass or blame Roger. Rather, she talks about her job and offers him food. Talking about her lifestyle and job showed how much trust she had through Roger and how personal she was among him, compared to being suspicious and pointing the finger at the boy. This defines the connection between the woman and Roger, and how she meant to help and never to embarrass or question him in wrong ways. All these reasons support the claim of Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones intending to assist Roger, instead of accusing the boy. Using three pieces of evidence attached with strong reasoning, this interpretation is valid and is proven as