Preview

Wallace's Arguments Against Abortion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wallace's Arguments Against Abortion
As we all know, Abortions are very well known and controversial in society today. Abortion is the process of removing a living human fetus from the mother's womb with an intention to end the life of that fetus preceding to its natural birth. Many people feel as though abortion is a huge crime; killing a human being, but just a different process. On the other hand, many other people may feel as though abortions are okay, and it should be the women’s decision on whether the fetus should continue to grow and become welcomed in the world today. Do the parents by any idea ever think that the fetus may have feelings? Do they feel pain when this action is taking place? We sort of need answers here. David Foster Wallace argues a very similar ethical …show more content…
Some may agree some may disagree with Wallace, but because many people may feel that lobsters aren’t human, cooking a lobster can’t be considered a moral decision, but on the other hand, we could look at how it is being cooked and consider it an ethical thought. Wallace curiosity level is extremely high on mortality regarding to animal cruelty, pain, feelings, and suffrage. By seeking Wallace’s “preference” of ethical questions based on animal cruelty, pain, feelings, and suffrage amongst the lobster, I’d consider how do we expect humans to have feelings for animals when they don’t even have feelings towards each other. Aborting a child, before it gets into the real world shows no sign of care, it doesn’t matter how bad the human may feel before, during, or after the process, it is wrong and should be took into …show more content…
They kill animals, so they can be eaten which is humanistic pleasure. Babies go through suffering as being aborted because of multiple of reasons. Maybe the women aren’t ready to be a parent yet, financial issues, or etc., but don’t take that child’s life away. When a baby is being aborted that human is pleased and relieved after that whole process is over with, so they won’t have to put up with that child, deal with the things that child might bring, or think about the life they just took. Wallace thinks that boiling these lobsters, killing them, are very uncomfortable in his opinion. As he thinks about the whole process, he also tries to avoid it, just how a mother would avoid that she’s killing her child. Sometimes what we accept as normal behavior is not always normal, in society there are always going to be opinions on if it is right or if it is wrong. We all here are human, when different situations occur, we should all be able to put our self in ones’ shoes and think about if we were in that predicament, would we like it? Or how would we feel? We think of the fetus as the lobster in this case, even though the lobster isn’t human, they share the same ways of reactions when they feel as though they are being harmed, which is to try to get away in the little space that they are in. The lobster takes on human traits, while the fetus is the human. The fetus isn’t born yet and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is growing inside her as God intended it and it is a living organism. It has human properties but not necessarily cognition. The fetus is unable to understand what is right or wrong yet it has a special relationship with the mother for it is growing in her uterus and it is a part of her during that time.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This branches from the way that one of the subjects that different individuals from animals is their ability to feel at all extraordinary or dreadful as for the fates of animals outside their species. If mankind…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Handout 1

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The standard argument that Thomson is making I that a fetus is a human from the moment it is conceived. That people say to view how humans are made in which includes the process of conception that is said to be human then it must be true.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judith Thomson’s argument through her article, “A Defence of Abortion” is one that adopts the premise that the fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. By doing this, Thomson is distancing her argument from the various theorists who maintain the moral view that it is wrong to kill another human being, such as (Marquis, 1989). This ultimately allows her to assume various hypothetical situations in which the cognitive status of the fetus is otherwise not considered. This is important. It helps the case she develops to detach itself from the focal points considered in the 'common argument', which illustrates that the development of a human being from conception through birth into childhood and then adulthood is continuous, and to draw a line where abortion is acceptable is futile. Thomson’s argument that contrasts a “right to life” against a “right to decide what happens in and to one’s body" is based on what Finnis describes as “confusing the issue” (Finnis, 1973). Throughout the article, her various thought experiments are presented in order to support and help the reader identify situations in which the permissibility of abortion seems just. This essay will scrutinise the effectiveness of Thomson’s ideas, and whether they have led to a more definable understanding when defending abortion.…

    • 2736 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-abortionists often refer to abortion as, ' the intentional killing of unborn babies', and see it as an evil deed, committed only by those who do not appreciate the value of human life. Although, it seems that, in many cases it is quite the opposite. In cases such as one night stands, rape or underage pregnancies, mothers often tend to choose abortion with the fear that they cannot give their child the life they deserve. These pregnancies are unwanted, accidental even. The mother does not plainly wish to kill her child for selfish reasons, but…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Marquis On Abortion

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Perfectly Accurate – Boonin and Oddie encapsulate what Marquis argues in his paper “Why abortion is Immoral” in a concise way that puts the argument into perspective. However, the presentation of arguments in the Boonin book could be considered slightly misleading in not capturing Marquis’s attempt to address the nonhuman animals issue in his paper. Marquis’s argument involves abortion, or the termination of a fetus. A fetus being the unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is an arbitrary choice and can be given no good answer. With it being so unclear, and the arguments very poor, Thomson does not deny the fetus as a person. We are inclined to agree that at some point the fetus has become a human person long before birth. By the tenth week it has already developed arms, legs, a face, and has brain activity. She also denies the premise, the fetus is not a person at conception.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When women get pregnant and don’t want the baby, most people think about abortion as their first choice and don’t even think about the unborn fetus. Every baby deserves to live, with or without the biological parents. Abortion happens everywhere throughout the world. Unsafe abortions result in 70,000 maternal deaths and 5 million hospital admissions per year.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Argument

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He states that non-human animals are farmed for food, experimented on, and we as humans fail to acknowledge the suffering that these animals go through, because we are too caught up in our own ‘selfish’ behavior. Overall, his main point is that from a moral standpoint, humans should reconsider our modern practices, and give all sentient non-human animals equal consideration. He suggests that we all adopt vegetarian diets, and only conduct experiments on non-human animals when it would do less harm than good. (205)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When looking at things from an ethical perspective, one has to consider how to protect and preserve the basic needs of others as well as their own. There is no difference here when dealing with the well being of animals. Alice Walter and Ted Kerasote are two individuals who deal with ethical issues regarding the well being of animals, and while their stories are vastly different, their main points have overlapping similarities. In Anthony Weston’s A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox, both Walter and Kerasote’s experiences are explicitly detailed through Walter’s essay, “Am I Blue?,” and Kerasote’s excerpt from Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt. Throughout both of their experiences, Weston’s three-part concept of ethics is put into full-effect.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over whether abortion should be legal and to what point in the pregnancy it should be allowed has polarized many societies. Many religious preach that at the moment of conception, the new life is human and possesses a soul. Therefore, abortion is murder. Other, less extreme views, suggest the life is not human until there is a recognizable "completion of form." A third view proposes we have an obligation to create a good life for all children already born before we bring more unwanted children into the world.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In these nine months, you are bedridden and will constantly be attached to this man. This example is used to paint the picture of a raped woman and raises the question of whether or not she should have to keep the child. Thomson argues that while it would be a “great kindness”, you do not have to accede to it. Thomson argues that abortion is moral because you do not hold a “special…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Letter to the Editor

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The “discovery” that animals can experience simple emotions like pain and fear does not justify the adoption of laws protecting animals from lab experiments or human consumption (16). Would a starving lion restrain itself before savagely slaughtering an innocent child for food? Why should humans treat animals any more humanitarianly than they treat us? Since the beginning of time, animals have killed and consumed other animals as part of the natural course of nature. If, as Rifkin argues, humans and animals should be equal, then humans should have as equal a right to participate in the “survival of the fittest” game as any animal does (17). To pass a law restricting the human consumption of animals would damn the human race to extinction. Rifkin’s bigotry and hypocrisy doesn’t stop here.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays