Why Is Animal Testing Bad
ANIMAL TESTING SHOULD BE BANNED.
“If those in power were smart or kind then there would not be any unnecessary animal cruelty in our world. "If.”
― Isabella Poretsis
Animal experimentation has been a regularly debated about subject for a long time, is it cruelty or science? Around 1.4 million animals die brutally due to the animal testing. This is a result of abuse ways animals are dealt with like by their experimenters. Animals ought to be free of the harsh researchers expose them to as they have the same amount of conscious as people do.
I think animal testing is a brutality more than science. Animals are not treated well and are mostly mishandled by their handlers. Little animals impart in a small box that estimated to no less than eight other little animals. That is an unacceptable life. Imagine,stuffing eight people into a small room. Where are all of you going to rest or get dressed? Difficult right? The animals will be held around metal groupp with an opening remove for the creatures head to be caught into, so they can't move around and be a bother while being tried on. Did you know, an ATS lab in North Carolina stuffs monkeys in tubes. Another unforgiving thing handlers do is take out the dog's vocal chords so they don't bother the lab laborers. With respect …show more content…
They said that animals deliver much faster then people do. Those animals are meaningless creature then individuals in any case right? that is totally wrong. Author Peter Singer says " People are animals as well, and we must respect the other species." And I agree with him completely. Different contentions are that manipulating animals is the cheapest idea, alternate tests are not as exact as animals testing and that experimentation have been helpful to human life. But now I'm not going to say that it hasn't been usefulat all but there could have been different
“If those in power were smart or kind then there would not be any unnecessary animal cruelty in our world. "If.”
― Isabella Poretsis
Animal experimentation has been a regularly debated about subject for a long time, is it cruelty or science? Around 1.4 million animals die brutally due to the animal testing. This is a result of abuse ways animals are dealt with like by their experimenters. Animals ought to be free of the harsh researchers expose them to as they have the same amount of conscious as people do.
I think animal testing is a brutality more than science. Animals are not treated well and are mostly mishandled by their handlers. Little animals impart in a small box that estimated to no less than eight other little animals. That is an unacceptable life. Imagine,stuffing eight people into a small room. Where are all of you going to rest or get dressed? Difficult right? The animals will be held around metal groupp with an opening remove for the creatures head to be caught into, so they can't move around and be a bother while being tried on. Did you know, an ATS lab in North Carolina stuffs monkeys in tubes. Another unforgiving thing handlers do is take out the dog's vocal chords so they don't bother the lab laborers. With respect …show more content…
They said that animals deliver much faster then people do. Those animals are meaningless creature then individuals in any case right? that is totally wrong. Author Peter Singer says " People are animals as well, and we must respect the other species." And I agree with him completely. Different contentions are that manipulating animals is the cheapest idea, alternate tests are not as exact as animals testing and that experimentation have been helpful to human life. But now I'm not going to say that it hasn't been usefulat all but there could have been different