Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Animal testing is a hotly debated topic making people around the world evaluate and test their morals. It’s often considered unethical, cruel, ineffective, and outdated for our time. I'm here to prove to people why it’s not all bad. Animal testing brings wonderful things to us, new medication ,and new understandings of biology and behavior. Animals testing is often considered unmoral for a good reason. It hurts and causes animals to suffer, but that's typically not the case as David Pruce as chief of Understanding Animal Research states “The use of animals in research is never undertaken lightly. Every single animal research project must be approved by Home Office Inspectors who are all doctors and vets, and by local ethical review committees,”(Pruce). Researchers never go too far when experimenting on animals. Experimenters will do the bare minimum in mistreating animals because they have to go through a committee just to allow them to do the experiment. Experimenters also need funding for their experiments. Funding comes mostly from donors. “Funding organizations - including medical research charities - will only fund top quality, relevant research. No one wants to use animals in research, and no one uses them unnecessarily or uncaringly. Animal research is a last resort and is used alongside other types
An argument from the opposite side would be that animal testing causes animals to suffer that maybe true ,but you also need to think about all the people suffering from diseases that animal testing can help them from their suffering wouldn’t it be more beneficial to save a person that has a purpose than a mice or monkey. Another argument for the opposing side would be that there are better methods to curing and understanding a disease. Animal testing is only used normally as a last resort if all other methods fail or are not getting fast enough