Answer : There is a long debate on the issue of whether the education system should have a general standard on the curriculum setting. Some argues that the policy should vary according the different condition in different areas in one country. Some common core curriculum could serve the purpose of any nation. At the same time, however, individual part of the nation should have the freedom to augment any curricular to distinctive areas.
First, some basic education such as moral instilling should be included in the core curriculum as the basic principle of any nation, with any distortion or alternative. It is essential for a country to keep its citizens not stray away from the track of its value system and world view.
Second, before the college education allows for much more diversity and creativity, the education system should stay stable and authoritative enough to ensure the basic knowledge and life skills can be introduced to the children. As we know, the primary purpose of education is to form the individual personality and the significance of one's life to himself and others, which is the basic architect of one's life. The rest is the ornamentation and decoration of this structure. The education or’s task, in this sense, is to design the architect and instill the structure with strong ideas and moral values. That is essentially to the student's growing as well as the health of the society as a whole. In the process of early education, the possibility that the students would lost their originality and their creativity should not be used as an excuse to deny the timeless problems they must resolved at their early stage. But in a society where overemphasize the efficiency and utilitarian function of education, the basic need of education is neglected to such an extent that the curriculum setting varies only according to the thought and