Animal Testing Whole-Body

If animals should be used for testing is a big dispute between people. I believe that it's alright for animals to be used for test. In the article, “should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing”, the author states “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years resulted directly from research using animals.” The text also states that “There is no adequate alternative to testing on a living, whole-body’s symptoms. In closure, animals are best for testing because it not only can benefit humans, but it also benefits some animals.

As a result from animal testing, the animals benefit likewise. “If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis, anthrax, and canine pauro. Animal testing has also
The text “Should animals be used for Scientific or Commercial Testing,” the author states that “American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance.” Safety for humans is very important to keep human existence alive. “China requires that all cosmetics be tested on animals before they go on sale, so cosmetics companies must have their products tested on animals if they want distribution in china.” While I believe that animals are alright to be tested on, the opposing side believes that it is not right to test things on animals. The text, “Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing,” the author states that “animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects.” The text also states that “chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans.” Most animals are not that much different from humans. Since animals are so much like humans, they are susceptible to some illnesses and