Animal Testing For Animals

It is obvious that Con organizations believe differently. Con organization also have five main beliefs. The first con they believe in animal testing is a cruel thing. They believe no living thing should be put to suffer because another species is curious. Although Pro organizations claim no animals are harmed the Con organization has released this statement to prove Pro organization wrong:
According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.” (Animal-Testing.ProCon.org.
This gives laboratories no excuse to keep harming animals. It is also very cheap compared to animal testing. The third main con is all drugs passed after animal testing, are not all safe. This makes animal testing useless since the whole point is to test animals and see if the product is same. The fourth main reason the atonally of animals have a difference to humans. Yes, they share similar organs and such, but they still have differences. So what is safe for an animal might not be safe for men. The fifth reason is medical breakthroughs can happen without animals. They could do this with donated material and eventually human volunteers.

As people see, there will alway be pros and cons to animal testing. There will be supporters and there will be protesters. Whether animal testing continues or not is out of there hand. It is in the hand of the government. For the time being they agree that animal testing is alright. Yes, they might not go out of there way to prove it, but the haven't tried to prevent it anyway. They have acts, but they make no use into enforcing